mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Policy Learning with Adaptively Collected Data

arXiv 2105.02344 ↗First posted 5 May 2021stat.ML cs.LG econ.EMcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning optimal policies from historical data enables personalization in a wide variety of applications including healthcare, digital recommendations, and online education. The growing policy learning literature focuses on settings where the data collection rule stays fixed throughout the experiment. However, adaptive data collection is becoming more common in practice, from two primary sources: 1) data collected from adaptive experiments that are designed to improve inferential efficiency; 2) data collected from production systems that progressively evolve an operational policy to improve performance over time (e.g. contextual bandits). Yet adaptivity complicates the optimal policy identification ex post, since samples are dependent, and each treatment may not receive enough observations for each type of individual. In this paper, we make initial research inquiries into addressing the challenges of learning the optimal policy with adaptively collected data. We propose an algorithm based on generalized augmented inverse propensity weighted (AIPW) estimators, which non-uniformly reweight the elements of a standard AIPW estimator to control worst-case estimation variance. We establish a finite-sample regret upper bound for our algorithm and complement it with a regret lower bound that quantifies the fundamental difficulty of policy learning with adaptive data. When equipped with the best weighting scheme, our algorithm achieves minimax rate optimal regret guarantees even with diminishing exploration. Finally, we demonstrate our algorithm's effectiveness using both synthetic data and public benchmark datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2021.

Builds on

22 of 86 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  2. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
  3. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
  4. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 362
  5. 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
  6. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  7. 2016Optimal and Adaptive Off-policy Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 111
  8. 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
  9. 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
  10. 2019Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkagecited by 87
  11. 2018Confounding-Robust Policy Improvementcited by 73
  12. 2018Offline Multi-Action Policy Learning: Generalization and Optimizationcited by 64
10 more
  1. 2020Off-policy Bandits with Deficient Supportcited by 60
  2. 2017Balanced Policy Evaluation and Learningcited by 51
  3. 2015Residual Weighted Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rulescited by 37
  4. 2017Why Adaptively Collected Data Have Negative Bias and How to Correct for Itcited by 36
  5. 2019Semi-Parametric Efficient Policy Learning with Continuous Actionscited by 26
  6. 2018Predicting with Proxies: Transfer Learning in High Dimensioncited by 24
  7. 2019Are sample means in multi-armed bandits positively or negatively biased?cited by 24
  8. 2017Estimation Considerations in Contextual Banditscited by 22
  9. 2016Dynamic Assortment Personalization in High Dimensionscited by 14
  10. 2020Efficient Policy Learning from Surrogate-Loss Classification Reductionscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Doubly Robust Distributionally Robust Off-Policy Evaluation and Learningcited by 34
  2. 2022Policy learning "without" overlap: Pessimism and generalized empirical Bernstein's inequalitycited by 32
  3. 2022On Instance-Dependent Bounds for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 22
  4. 2022Non-Stationary Representation Learning in Sequential Linear Banditscited by 13
  5. 2022Off-policy estimation of linear functionals: Non-asymptotic theory for semi-parametric efficiencycited by 10
  6. 2023Learning Complementary Policies for Human-AI Teamscited by 7
  7. 2022Contextual Bandits in a Survey Experiment on Charitable Giving: Within-Experiment Outcomes versus Policy Learningcited by 6
  8. 2023Sequential Counterfactual Risk Minimizationcited by 6
  9. 2023Adaptive Linear Estimating Equationscited by 6
  10. 2024On Sample-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: Data Diversity, Posterior Sampling, and Beyondcited by 6
  11. 2024Distributionally Robust Policy Learning under Concept Driftscited by 5
  12. 2026A Statistical Framework for Alignment with Biased AI Feedbackcited by 4
9 more
  1. 2024Robust Offline Policy Learning with Observational Data from Multiple Sourcescited by 3
  2. 2024Off-policy estimation with adaptively collected data: the power of online learningcited by 3
  3. 2024Adaptive Experimental Design for Policy Learningcited by 1
  4. 2026Design Experiments to Compare Multi-armed Bandit Algorithmscited by 1
  5. 2023Federated Offline Policy Learningcited by 0
  6. 2025Fast Best-in-Class Regret for Contextual Banditscited by 0
  7. 2026Pessimistic Risk-Aware Policy Learning in Contextual Banditscited by 0
  8. 2026Wasserstein Policy Learning for Distributional Outcomescited by 0
  9. 2026A Hierarchy of Policy Learning Problemscited by 0