Generative Context Pair Selection for Multi-hop Question Answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compositional reasoning tasks like multi-hop question answering, require making latent decisions to get the final answer, given a question. However, crowdsourced datasets often capture only a slice of the underlying task distribution, which can induce unanticipated biases in models performing compositional reasoning. Furthermore, discriminatively trained models exploit such biases to get a better held-out performance, without learning the right way to reason, as they do not necessitate paying attention to the question representation (conditioning variable) in its entirety, to estimate the answer likelihood. In this work, we propose a generative context selection model for multi-hop question answering that reasons about how the given question could have been generated given a context pair. While being comparable to the state-of-the-art answering performance, our proposed generative passage selection model has a better performance (4.9% higher than baseline) on adversarial held-out set which tests robustness of model's multi-hop reasoning capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2021.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
References · 28
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
- 2017SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Enginecited by 221
- 2017Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documentscited by 190
16 more
- 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
- 2019Synthetic QA Corpora Generation with Roundtrip Consistencycited by 143
- 2017Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehensioncited by 120
- 2020Unsupervised Question Decomposition for Question Answeringcited by 118
- 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 87
- 2019Hierarchical Graph Network for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 83
- 2019A Discrete Hard EM Approach for Weakly Supervised Question Answeringcited by 78
- 2019Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts: Adversarial Evaluation, Training, and Model Development for Multi-Hop QAcited by 63
- 2019Select, Answer and Explain: Interpretable Multi-hop Reading Comprehension over Multiple Documentscited by 57
- 2020Generating Fact Checking Briefscited by 50
- 2019Multi-step Retriever-Reader Interaction for Scalable Open-domain Question Answeringcited by 48
- 2019Multi-hop Question Answering via Reasoning Chainscited by 42
- 2016Generating Factoid Questions With Recurrent Neural Networks: The 30M Factoid Question-Answer Corpuscited by 33
- 2018Phrase-Indexed Question Answering: A New Challenge for Scalable Document Comprehensioncited by 23
- 2020Beyond [CLS] through Ranking by Generationcited by 20
- 2020Is Graph Structure Necessary for Multi-hop Question Answering?cited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.