mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Domain Invariant Adversarial Learning

arXiv 2104.00322 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The phenomenon of adversarial examples illustrates one of the most basic vulnerabilities of deep neural networks. Among the variety of techniques introduced to surmount this inherent weakness, adversarial training has emerged as the most effective strategy for learning robust models. Typically, this is achieved by balancing robust and natural objectives. In this work, we aim to further optimize the trade-off between robust and standard accuracy by enforcing a domain-invariant feature representation. We present a new adversarial training method, Domain Invariant Adversarial Learning (DIAL), which learns a feature representation that is both robust and domain invariant. DIAL uses a variant of Domain Adversarial Neural Network (DANN) on the natural domain and its corresponding adversarial domain. In the case where the source domain consists of natural examples and the target domain is the adversarially perturbed examples, our method learns a feature representation constrained not to discriminate between the natural and adversarial examples, and can therefore achieve a more robust representation. DIAL is a generic and modular technique that can be easily incorporated into any adversarial training method. Our experiments indicate that incorporating DIAL in the adversarial training process improves both robustness and standard accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2021.

Builds on

72 of 97 references.

References · 72

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  5. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  8. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  9. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  10. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  11. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  12. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
38 more
  1. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  2. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  3. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
  4. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  5. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  6. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  7. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  8. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  9. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  10. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  11. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  12. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  13. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  14. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  15. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  16. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  17. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  18. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  19. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
  20. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  21. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  22. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  23. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
  24. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  25. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
  26. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  27. 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
  28. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  29. 2018Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examplescited by 178
  30. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
  31. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
  32. 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 152
  33. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
  34. 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 141
  35. 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
  36. 2019Adversarially Robust Distillationcited by 124
  37. 2018Decoupling Direction and Norm for Efficient Gradient-Based L2 Adversarial Attacks and Defensescited by 109
  38. 2018Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Surface Variationscited by 99

50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

7 papers.