mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep-RBF Networks for Anomaly Detection in Automotive Cyber-Physical Systems

arXiv 2103.14172 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are popularly used for implementing autonomy related tasks in automotive Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs). However, these networks have been shown to make erroneous predictions to anomalous inputs, which manifests either due to Out-of-Distribution (OOD) data or adversarial attacks. To detect these anomalies, a separate DNN called assurance monitor is often trained and used in parallel to the controller DNN, increasing the resource burden and latency. We hypothesize that a single network that can perform controller predictions and anomaly detection is necessary to reduce the resource requirements. Deep-Radial Basis Function (RBF) networks provide a rejection class alongside the class predictions, which can be utilized for detecting anomalies at runtime. However, the use of RBF activation functions limits the applicability of these networks to only classification tasks. In this paper, we show how the deep-RBF network can be used for detecting anomalies in CPS regression tasks such as continuous steering predictions. Further, we design deep-RBF networks using popular DNNs such as NVIDIA DAVE-II, and ResNet20, and then use the resulting rejection class for detecting adversarial attacks such as a physical attack and data poison attack. Finally, we evaluate these attacks and the trained deep-RBF networks using a hardware CPS testbed called DeepNNCar and a real-world German Traffic Sign Benchmark (GTSB) dataset. Our results show that the deep-RBF networks can robustly detect these attacks in a short time without additional resource requirements.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2021.

Builds on

18 of 27 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  4. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  5. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  6. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  7. 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 429
  8. 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
  9. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences Competitioncited by 96
  10. 2020Real-time Out-of-distribution Detection in Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 46
  11. 2019Attacking Vision-based Perception in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Modelscited by 31
  12. 2018Resisting Adversarial Attacks using Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 26
6 more
  1. 2019Simple Physical Adversarial Examples against End-to-End Autonomous Driving Modelscited by 17
  2. 2020Out-of-Distribution Detection in Multi-Label Datasets using Latent Space of β-VAEcited by 15
  3. 2018Deep-RBF Networks Revisited: Robust Classification with Rejectioncited by 10
  4. 2020FADER: Fast Adversarial Example Rejectioncited by 9
  5. 2021ReSonAte: A Runtime Risk Assessment Framework for Autonomous Systemscited by 9
  6. 2020Detecting Adversarial Examples in Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems using Variational Autoencoder for Regressioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.