FADER: Fast Adversarial Example Rejection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, i.e., carefully-crafted inputs that mislead classification at test time. Recent defenses have been shown to improve adversarial robustness by detecting anomalous deviations from legitimate training samples at different layer representations - a behavior normally exhibited by adversarial attacks. Despite technical differences, all aforementioned methods share a common backbone structure that we formalize and highlight in this contribution, as it can help in identifying promising research directions and drawbacks of existing methods. The first main contribution of this work is the review of these detection methods in the form of a unifying framework designed to accommodate both existing defenses and newer ones to come. In terms of drawbacks, the overmentioned defenses require comparing input samples against an oversized number of reference prototypes, possibly at different representation layers, dramatically worsening the test-time efficiency. Besides, such defenses are typically based on ensembling classifiers with heuristic methods, rather than optimizing the whole architecture in an end-to-end manner to better perform detection. As a second main contribution of this work, we introduce FADER, a novel technique for speeding up detection-based methods. FADER overcome the issues above by employing RBF networks as detectors: by fixing the number of required prototypes, the runtime complexity of adversarial examples detectors can be controlled. Our experiments outline up to 73x prototypes reduction compared to analyzed detectors for MNIST dataset and up to 50x for CIFAR10 dataset respectively, without sacrificing classification accuracy on both clean and adversarial data.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples Apartcited by 14
- 2022Layer-wise Regularized Adversarial Training using Layers Sustainability Analysis (LSA) frameworkcited by 2
- 2023Hardening RGB-D Object Recognition Systems against Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 2
- 2025Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descentcited by 2
- 2021Deep-RBF Networks for Anomaly Detection in Automotive Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 1
- 2024SoK: Analyzing Adversarial Examples: A Framework to Study Adversary Knowledgecited by 1
- 2022Adversarial Detection by Approximation of Ensemble Boundarycited by 0
- 2023Measuring Equality in Machine Learning Security Defenses: A Case Study in Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2024Manipulating hidden-Markov-model inferences by corrupting batch datacited by 0
- 2025Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descent25 Mar 2025
- 2024SoK: Analyzing Adversarial Examples: A Framework to Study Adversary Knowledge22 Feb 2024
- 2024Manipulating hidden-Markov-model inferences by corrupting batch data19 Feb 2024
- 2023Hardening RGB-D Object Recognition Systems against Adversarial Patch Attacks13 Sep 2023
- 2023Measuring Equality in Machine Learning Security Defenses: A Case Study in Speech Recognition17 Feb 2023
- 2022Adversarial Detection by Approximation of Ensemble Boundary18 Nov 2022
- 2022Layer-wise Regularized Adversarial Training using Layers Sustainability Analysis (LSA) framework5 Feb 2022
- 2021Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples Apart31 May 2021
- 2021Deep-RBF Networks for Anomaly Detection in Automotive Cyber-Physical Systems25 Mar 2021