ReSonAte: A Runtime Risk Assessment Framework for Autonomous Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous CPSs are often required to handle uncertainties and self-manage the system operation in response to problems and increasing risk in the operating paradigm. This risk may arise due to distribution shifts, environmental context, or failure of software or hardware components. Traditional techniques for risk assessment focus on design-time techniques such as hazard analysis, risk reduction, and assurance cases among others. However, these static, design-time techniques do not consider the dynamic contexts and failures the systems face at runtime. We hypothesize that this requires a dynamic assurance approach that computes the likelihood of unsafe conditions or system failures considering the safety requirements, assumptions made at design time, past failures in a given operating context, and the likelihood of system component failures. We introduce the ReSonAte dynamic risk estimation framework for autonomous systems. ReSonAte reasons over Bow-Tie Diagrams (BTDs) which capture information about hazard propagation paths and control strategies. Our innovation is the extension of the BTD formalism with attributes for modeling the conditional relationships with the state of the system and environment. We also describe a technique for estimating these conditional relationships and equations for estimating risk based on the state of the system and environment. To help with this process, we provide a scenario modeling procedure that can use the prior distributions of the scenes and threat conditions to generate the data required for estimating the conditional relationships. To improve scalability and reduce the amount of data required, this process considers each control strategy in isolation and composes several single-variate distributions into one complete multi-variate distribution for the control strategy in question.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
9 papers.
- 2021Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Latent Space of β-VAE for Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 19
- 2022ANTI-CARLA: An Adversarial Testing Framework for Autonomous Vehicles in CARLAcited by 8
- 2021Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptionscited by 6
- 2022Risk-Aware Scene Sampling for Dynamic Assurance of Autonomous Systemscited by 4
- 2023Dynamic Simplex: Balancing Safety and Performance in Autonomous Cyber Physical Systemscited by 3
- 2021Deep-RBF Networks for Anomaly Detection in Automotive Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 1
- 2023Co-Design of Out-of-Distribution Detectors for Autonomous Emergency Braking Systemscited by 1
- 2025Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systemscited by 0
- 2025Towards Continuous Assurance with Formal Verification and Assurance Casescited by 0
- 2025Towards Continuous Assurance with Formal Verification and Assurance Cases17 Nov 2025
- 2025Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems5 Jun 2025
- 2023Co-Design of Out-of-Distribution Detectors for Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems25 Jul 2023
- 2023Dynamic Simplex: Balancing Safety and Performance in Autonomous Cyber Physical Systems20 Feb 2023
- 2022ANTI-CARLA: An Adversarial Testing Framework for Autonomous Vehicles in CARLA19 Jul 2022
- 2022Risk-Aware Scene Sampling for Dynamic Assurance of Autonomous Systems28 Feb 2022
- 2021Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptions3 Nov 2021
- 2021Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Latent Space of β-VAE for Cyber-Physical Systems26 Aug 2021
- 2021Deep-RBF Networks for Anomaly Detection in Automotive Cyber-Physical Systems25 Mar 2021