Co-matching: Combating Noisy Labels by Augmentation Anchoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning with noisy labels is challenging as deep neural networks have the high capacity to memorize the noisy labels. In this paper, we propose a learning algorithm called Co-matching, which balances the consistency and divergence between two networks by augmentation anchoring. Specifically, we have one network generate anchoring label from its prediction on a weakly-augmented image. Meanwhile, we force its peer network, taking the strongly-augmented version of the same image as input, to generate prediction close to the anchoring label. We then update two networks simultaneously by selecting small-loss instances to minimize both unsupervised matching loss (i.e., measure the consistency of the two networks) and supervised classification loss (i.e. measure the classification performance). Besides, the unsupervised matching loss makes our method not heavily rely on noisy labels, which prevents memorization of noisy labels. Experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that Co-matching achieves results comparable to the state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2021.
Builds on
37 of 52 references.
References · 37
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
25 more
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
- 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
- 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
- 2019Improving Referring Expression Grounding with Cross-modal Attention-guided Erasingcited by 88
- 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
- 2014Training Convolutional Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 47
- 2018A Semi-Supervised Two-Stage Approach to Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021Not All Negatives are Equal: Label-Aware Contrastive Loss for Fine-grained Text Classificationcited by 43
- 2022Centrality and Consistency: Two-Stage Clean Samples Identification for Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labelscited by 16
- 2021Confidence Adaptive Regularization for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 5
- 2022Combating Noisy Labels in Long-Tailed Image Classificationcited by 2
- 2022Combating Noisy Labels in Long-Tailed Image Classification1 Sep 2022
- 2022Centrality and Consistency: Two-Stage Clean Samples Identification for Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels29 Jul 2022
- 2021Not All Negatives are Equal: Label-Aware Contrastive Loss for Fine-grained Text Classification12 Sep 2021
- 2021Confidence Adaptive Regularization for Deep Learning with Noisy Labels18 Aug 2021