mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gender and Racial Fairness in Depression Research using Social Media

arXiv 2103.10550 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2021cs.CLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multiple studies have demonstrated that behavior on internet-based social media platforms can be indicative of an individual's mental health status. The widespread availability of such data has spurred interest in mental health research from a computational lens. While previous research has raised concerns about possible biases in models produced from this data, no study has quantified how these biases actually manifest themselves with respect to different demographic groups, such as gender and racial/ethnic groups. Here, we analyze the fairness of depression classifiers trained on Twitter data with respect to gender and racial demographic groups. We find that model performance systematically differs for underrepresented groups and that these discrepancies cannot be fully explained by trivial data representation issues. Our study concludes with recommendations on how to avoid these biases in future research.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2021.

Builds on

9 of 65 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  4. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  5. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  6. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  7. 2020On the State of Social Media Data for Mental Health Researchcited by 32
  8. 2017Quantifying Mental Health from Social Media with Neural User Embeddingscited by 13
  9. 2020Using Noisy Self-Reports to Predict Twitter User Demographicscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Can AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health Supportcited by 21
  2. 2022Gendered Mental Health Stigma in Masked Language Modelscited by 17
  3. 2021Micromodels for Efficient, Explainable, and Reusable Systems: A Case Study on Mental Healthcited by 13
  4. 2023Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Datacited by 13
  5. 2024Diverse Perspectives, Divergent Models: Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Depression Detection on Twittercited by 12
  6. 2025Machine Learning Fairness for Depression Detection using EEG Datacited by 7
  7. 2024On the State of NLP Approaches to Modeling Depression in Social Media: A Post-COVID-19 Outlookcited by 6
  8. 2022Then and Now: Quantifying the Longitudinal Validity of Self-Disclosed Depression Diagnosescited by 4
  9. 2024Towards Algorithmic Fidelity: Mental Health Representation across Demographics in Synthetic vs. Human-generated Datacited by 4
  10. 2022The Problem of Semantic Shift in Longitudinal Monitoring of Social Media: A Case Study on Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemiccited by 3
  11. 2025A Survey on Multilingual Mental Disorders Detection from Social Media Datacited by 3
  12. 2026Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental Healthcited by 2
5 more
  1. 2022The effects of gender bias in word embeddings on depression predictioncited by 1
  2. 2022Using Open-Ended Stressor Responses to Predict Depressive Symptoms across Demographicscited by 0
  3. 2023Human Behavior in the Time of COVID-19: Learning from Big Datacited by 0
  4. 2023Transferring Fairness using Multi-Task Learning with Limited Demographic Informationcited by 0
  5. 2026The Divergence Hypothesis: Unmasking Lexical Interference and Label Bias in Mental Health NLPcited by 0