Combinatorial Bandits without Total Order for Arms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the combinatorial bandits problem, where at each time step, the online learner selects a size-k subset s from the arms set A, where left|Aright| = n, and observes a stochastic reward of each arm in the selected set s. The goal of the online learner is to minimize the regret, induced by not selecting s^* which maximizes the expected total reward. Specifically, we focus on a challenging setting where 1) the reward distribution of an arm depends on the set s it is part of, and crucially 2) there is textitno total order for the arms in A. In this paper, we formally present a reward model that captures set-dependent reward distribution and assumes no total order for arms. Correspondingly, we propose an Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algorithm that maintains UCB for each individual arm and selects the arms with top-k UCB. We develop a novel regret analysis and show an Oleft(frack2 n log Tεright) gap-dependent regret bound as well as an Oleft(k2√n T log Tright) gap-independent regret bound. We also provide a lower bound for the proposed reward model, which shows our proposed algorithm is near-optimal for any constant k. Empirical results on various reward models demonstrate the broad applicability of our algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2021.
Builds on
9 of 23 references.
References · 9
- 2014Reducing Dueling Bandits to Cardinal Banditscited by 62
- 2017MNL-Bandit: A Dynamic Learning Approach to Assortment Selectioncited by 50
- 2017Multi-dueling Bandits with Dependent Armscited by 35
- 2017Thompson Sampling for the MNL-Banditcited by 35
- 2019Combinatorial Bandits with Relative Feedbackcited by 19
- 2016Multi-Dueling Bandits and Their Application to Online Ranker Evaluationcited by 16
- 2016Best-of-K Banditscited by 7
- 2017A Note on a Tight Lower Bound for MNL-Bandit Assortment Selection Modelscited by 7
- 2014Optimizing Expected Utility in a Multinomial Logit Model with Position Bias and Social Influencecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Offline Local Search for Online Stochastic Bandits
- 2026Offline-to-Online Learning in Linear Bandits
- 2024Stochastic k-Submodular Bandits with Full Bandit Feedback
- 2025A Resilience Framework for Bi-Criteria Combinatorial Optimization with Bandit Feedback
- 2021Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimization
- 2026On the Complexity of Preference-Based Bandits
- 2024Linear Contextual Bandits with Hybrid Payoff: Revisited
- 2024Is Offline Decision Making Possible with Only Few Samples? Reliable Decisions in Data-Starved Bandits via Trust Region Enhancement