mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Linear Contextual Bandits with Hybrid Payoff: Revisited

arXiv 2406.10131 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the Linear Contextual Bandit problem in the hybrid reward setting. In this setting every arm's reward model contains arm specific parameters in addition to parameters shared across the reward models of all the arms. We can reduce this setting to two closely related settings (a) Shared - no arm specific parameters, and (b) Disjoint - only arm specific parameters, enabling the application of two popular state of the art algorithms - textttLinUCB and textttDisLinUCB (Algorithm 1 in (Li et al. 2010)). When the arm features are stochastic and satisfy a popular diversity condition, we provide new regret analyses for both algorithms, significantly improving on the known regret guarantees of these algorithms. Our novel analysis critically exploits the hybrid reward structure and the diversity condition. Moreover, we introduce a new algorithm textttHyLinUCB that crucially modifies textttLinUCB (using a new exploration coefficient) to account for sparsity in the hybrid setting. Under the same diversity assumptions, we prove that textttHyLinUCB also incurs only O(√T) regret for T rounds. We perform extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrating strong empirical performance of textttHyLinUCB.For number of arm specific parameters much larger than the number of shared parameters, we observe that textttDisLinUCB incurs the lowest regret. In this case, regret of textttHyLinUCB is the second best and extremely competitive to textttDisLinUCB. In all other situations, including our real-world dataset, textttHyLinUCB has significantly lower regret than textttLinUCB, textttDisLinUCB and other SOTA baselines we considered. We also empirically observe that the regret of textttHyLinUCB grows much slower with the number of arms compared to baselines, making it suitable even for very large action spaces.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

8 of 26 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
  2. 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
  3. 2016On Context-Dependent Clustering of Banditscited by 44
  4. 2018An Efficient Bandit Algorithm for Realtime Multivariate Optimizationcited by 34
  5. 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
  6. 2019OSOM: A simultaneously optimal algorithm for multi-armed and linear contextual banditscited by 28
  7. 2020Problem-Complexity Adaptive Model Selection for Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 26
  8. 2022Squeeze All: Novel Estimator and Self-Normalized Bound for Linear Contextual Banditscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivity
  2. 2024Neural Dueling Bandits: Preference-Based Optimization with Human Feedback
  3. 2025Provable Anytime Ensemble Sampling Algorithms in Nonlinear Contextual Bandits
  4. 2020Tractable contextual bandits beyond realizability
  5. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Bandits with Offline Regression Oracles
  6. 2022Flexible and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Oracles
  7. 2026Bellman-Centric Learning: Near-Optimal Regret for Linear Bandits with Memory
  8. 2026Offline Local Search for Online Stochastic Bandits