Validation of cluster analysis results on validation data: A systematic framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cluster analysis refers to a wide range of data analytic techniques for class discovery and is popular in many application fields. To judge the quality of a clustering result, different cluster validation procedures have been proposed in the literature. While there is extensive work on classical validation techniques, such as internal and external validation, less attention has been given to validating and replicating a clustering result using a validation dataset. Such a dataset may be part of the original dataset, which is separated before analysis begins, or it could be an independently collected dataset. We present a systematic structured framework for validating clustering results on validation data that includes most existing validation approaches. In particular, we review classical validation techniques such as internal and external validation, stability analysis, hypothesis testing, and visual validation, and show how they can be interpreted in terms of our framework. We precisely define and formalise different types of validation of clustering results on a validation dataset and explain how each type can be implemented in practice. Furthermore, we give examples of how clustering studies from the applied literature that used a validation dataset can be classified into the framework.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2022A framework for benchmarking clustering algorithmscited by 15
- 2022On the role of benchmarking data sets and simulations in method comparison studiescited by 7
- 2022Enhancing cluster analysis via topological manifold learningcited by 6
- 2023Clustering with minimum spanning trees: How good can it be?cited by 4
- 2022Normalised clustering accuracy: An asymmetric external cluster validity measurecited by 2
- 2025Unveiling 3D Ocean Biogeochemical Provinces in the North Atlantic: A Systematic Comparison and Validation of Clustering Methodscited by 1
- 2026Cluster Analysis with Resampling for Validation and Exploration (CARVE)cited by 1
- 2021Selecting the number of clusters, clustering models, and algorithms. A unifying approach based on the quadratic discriminant scorecited by 0
- 2023Quantitative Energy Prediction based on Carbon Emission Analysis by DPR Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026Cluster LOCO: Feature Importance For Interpreting Clusterscited by 0
- 2026From Unsupervised Subgroups to Hypothetical State-Intervention Policies: An Evaluation of Selected Subgrouping Methods in Observational Health Datacited by 0
- 2026From Unsupervised Subgroups to Hypothetical State-Intervention Policies: An Evaluation of Selected Subgrouping Methods in Observational Health Data29 Jul 2026
- 2026Cluster LOCO: Feature Importance For Interpreting Clusters12 Jun 2026
- 2026Cluster Analysis with Resampling for Validation and Exploration (CARVE)29 May 2026
- 2025Unveiling 3D Ocean Biogeochemical Provinces in the North Atlantic: A Systematic Comparison and Validation of Clustering Methods25 Apr 2025
- 2023Quantitative Energy Prediction based on Carbon Emission Analysis by DPR Framework3 Sep 2023
- 2023Clustering with minimum spanning trees: How good can it be?10 Mar 2023
- 2022A framework for benchmarking clustering algorithms20 Sep 2022
- 2022Normalised clustering accuracy: An asymmetric external cluster validity measure7 Sep 2022
- 2022On the role of benchmarking data sets and simulations in method comparison studies2 Aug 2022
- 2022Enhancing cluster analysis via topological manifold learning1 Jul 2022
- 2021Selecting the number of clusters, clustering models, and algorithms. A unifying approach based on the quadratic discriminant score3 Nov 2021