Enhancing cluster analysis via topological manifold learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We discuss topological aspects of cluster analysis and show that inferring the topological structure of a dataset before clustering it can considerably enhance cluster detection: theoretical arguments and empirical evidence show that clustering embedding vectors, representing the structure of a data manifold instead of the observed feature vectors themselves, is highly beneficial. To demonstrate, we combine manifold learning method UMAP for inferring the topological structure with density-based clustering method DBSCAN. Synthetic and real data results show that this both simplifies and improves clustering in a diverse set of low- and high-dimensional problems including clusters of varying density and/or entangled shapes. Our approach simplifies clustering because topological pre-processing consistently reduces parameter sensitivity of DBSCAN. Clustering the resulting embeddings with DBSCAN can then even outperform complex methods such as SPECTACL and ClusterGAN. Finally, our investigation suggests that the crucial issue in clustering does not appear to be the nominal dimension of the data or how many irrelevant features it contains, but rather how textitseparable the clusters are in the ambient observation space they are embedded in, which is usually the (high-dimensional) Euclidean space defined by the features of the data. Our approach is successful because we perform the cluster analysis after projecting the data into a more suitable space that is optimized for separability, in some sense.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2022.
Builds on
20 of 111 references.
References · 20
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2017An introduction to Topological Data Analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientistscited by 171
- 2020Understanding How Dimension Reduction Tools Work: An Empirical Approach to Deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for Data Visualizationcited by 170
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
- 2020A unifying mutual information view of metric learning: cross-entropy vs. pairwise lossescited by 100
- 2018Turning Big data into tiny data: Constant-size coresets for k-means, PCA and projective clusteringcited by 94
- 2018ClusterGAN : Latent Space Clustering in Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 75
- 2017Clustering with t-SNE, provablycited by 51
- 2016Topological Data Analysiscited by 16
- 2013Spectral Clustering Based on Local PCAcited by 15
- 2017On the Local Structure of Stable Clustering Instancescited by 13
8 more
- 2020TopoMap: A 0-dimensional Homology Preserving Projection of High-Dimensional Datacited by 13
- 2021Validation of cluster analysis results on validation data: A systematic frameworkcited by 11
- 2021Clustering with UMAP: Why and How Connectivity Matterscited by 9
- 2021A Novel Intrinsic Measure of Data Separabilitycited by 9
- 2019The SpectACl of Nonconvex Clustering: A Spectral Approach to Density-Based Clusteringcited by 6
- 2020Unsupervised Functional Data Analysis via Nonlinear Dimension Reductioncited by 4
- 2017A New Method for Performance Analysis in Nonlinear Dimensionality Reductioncited by 3
- 2021A geometric perspective on functional outlier detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Position: Why We Must Rethink Empirical Research in Machine Learningcited by 19
- 2024Beyond Scalars: Concept-Based Alignment Analysis in Vision Transformerscited by 11
- 2025Unsupervised Machine-Learning Pipeline for Data-Driven Defect Detection and Characterisation: Application to Displacement Cascadescited by 2
- 2025Unveiling 3D Ocean Biogeochemical Provinces in the North Atlantic: A Systematic Comparison and Validation of Clustering Methodscited by 1
- 2025CSTS: A Benchmark for the Discovery of Correlation Structures in Time Series Clusteringcited by 1
- 2026Assessing the impact of dimensionality reduction on clustering performance - a systematic studycited by 0
- 2026Assessing the impact of dimensionality reduction on clustering performance - a systematic study23 Apr 2026
- 2025Unsupervised Machine-Learning Pipeline for Data-Driven Defect Detection and Characterisation: Application to Displacement Cascades28 Oct 2025
- 2025CSTS: A Benchmark for the Discovery of Correlation Structures in Time Series Clustering20 May 2025
- 2025Unveiling 3D Ocean Biogeochemical Provinces in the North Atlantic: A Systematic Comparison and Validation of Clustering Methods25 Apr 2025
- 2024Beyond Scalars: Concept-Based Alignment Analysis in Vision Transformers9 Dec 2024
- 2024Position: Why We Must Rethink Empirical Research in Machine Learning3 May 2024