Selecting the number of clusters, clustering models, and algorithms. A unifying approach based on the quadratic discriminant score
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cluster analysis requires many decisions: the clustering method and the implied reference model, the number of clusters and, often, several hyper-parameters and algorithms' tunings. In practice, one produces several partitions, and a final one is chosen based on validation or selection criteria. There exist an abundance of validation methods that, implicitly or explicitly, assume a certain clustering notion. Moreover, they are often restricted to operate on partitions obtained from a specific method. In this paper, we focus on groups that can be well separated by quadratic or linear boundaries. The reference cluster concept is defined through the quadratic discriminant score function and parameters describing clusters' size, center and scatter. We develop two cluster-quality criteria called quadratic scores. We show that these criteria are consistent with groups generated from a general class of elliptically-symmetric distributions. The quest for this type of groups is common in applications. The connection with likelihood theory for mixture models and model-based clustering is investigated. Based on bootstrap resampling of the quadratic scores, we propose a selection rule that allows choosing among many clustering solutions. The proposed method has the distinctive advantage that it can compare partitions that cannot be compared with other state-of-the-art methods. Extensive numerical experiments and the analysis of real data show that, even if some competing methods turn out to be superior in some setups, the proposed methodology achieves a better overall performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2021.
Builds on
7 of 65 references.
References · 7
- 2021Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?cited by 65
- 2021Validation of cluster analysis results on validation data: A systematic frameworkcited by 11
- 2017Estimating the number of clusters using cross-validationcited by 6
- 2018Mixtures of Experts Modelscited by 6
- 2014Robust improper maximum likelihood: tuning, computation, and a comparison with other methods for robust Gaussian clusteringcited by 5
- 2015Clustering strategy and method selectioncited by 5
- 2020Comparing clusterings and numbers of clusters by aggregation of calibrated clustering validity indexescited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.