mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A framework for benchmarking clustering algorithms

arXiv 2209.09493 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of clustering algorithms can involve running them on a variety of benchmark problems, and comparing their outputs to the reference, ground-truth groupings provided by experts. Unfortunately, many research papers and graduate theses consider only a small number of datasets. Also, the fact that there can be many equally valid ways to cluster a given problem set is rarely taken into account. In order to overcome these limitations, we have developed a framework whose aim is to introduce a consistent methodology for testing clustering algorithms. Furthermore, we have aggregated, polished, and standardised many clustering benchmark dataset collections referred to across the machine learning and data mining literature, and included new datasets of different dimensionalities, sizes, and cluster types. An interactive datasets explorer, the documentation of the Python API, a description of the ways to interact with the framework from other programming languages such as R or MATLAB, and other details are all provided at <https://clustering-benchmarks.gagolewski.com>.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.

Builds on

4 of 36 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022Are Cluster Validity Measures (In)valid?cited by 16
  2. 2021Validation of cluster analysis results on validation data: A systematic frameworkcited by 11
  3. 2022Genie: A new, fast, and outlier-resistant hierarchical clustering algorithmcited by 10
  4. 2022Normalised clustering accuracy: An asymmetric external cluster validity measurecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort: