mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Effectiveness of Dataset Embeddings in Mono-lingual,Multi-lingual and Zero-shot Conditions

arXiv 2103.01273 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2021cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent complementary strands of research have shown that leveraging information on the data source through encoding their properties into embeddings can lead to performance increase when training a single model on heterogeneous data sources. However, it remains unclear in which situations these dataset embeddings are most effective, because they are used in a large variety of settings, languages and tasks. Furthermore, it is usually assumed that gold information on the data source is available, and that the test data is from a distribution seen during training. In this work, we compare the effect of dataset embeddings in mono-lingual settings, multi-lingual settings, and with predicted data source label in a zero-shot setting. We evaluate on three morphosyntactic tasks: morphological tagging, lemmatization, and dependency parsing, and use 104 datasets, 66 languages, and two different dataset grouping strategies. Performance increases are highest when the datasets are of the same language, and we know from which distribution the test-instance is drawn. In contrast, for setups where the data is from an unseen distribution, performance increase vanishes.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2021.

Builds on

11 of 30 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
  2. 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
  3. 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 143
  4. 2019The SIGMORPHON 2019 Shared Task: Morphological Analysis in Context and Cross-Lingual Transfer for Inflectioncited by 43
  5. 2018UniMorph 2.0: Universal Morphologycited by 40
  6. 2016Many Languages, One Parsercited by 26
  7. 201882 Treebanks, 34 Models: Universal Dependency Parsing with Multi-Treebank Modelscited by 11
  8. 2018Parser Training with Heterogeneous Treebankscited by 8
  9. 2017Joining Hands: Exploiting Monolingual Treebanks for Parsing of Code-mixing Datacited by 7
  10. 2019Cross-lingual Parsing with Polyglot Training and Multi-treebank Learning: A Faroese Case Studycited by 3
  11. 2020Treebank Embedding Vectors for Out-of-domain Dependency Parsingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 3.

4 papers.