mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Am I a Real or Fake Celebrity? Measuring Commercial Face Recognition Web APIs under Deepfake Impersonation Attack

arXiv 2103.00847 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2021cs.CV cs.AI cs.CRcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, significant advancements have been made in face recognition technologies using Deep Neural Networks. As a result, companies such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Naver offer highly accurate commercial face recognition web services for diverse applications to meet the end-user needs. Naturally, however, such technologies are threatened persistently, as virtually any individual can quickly implement impersonation attacks. In particular, these attacks can be a significant threat for authentication and identification services, which heavily rely on their underlying face recognition technologies' accuracy and robustness. Despite its gravity, the issue regarding deepfake abuse using commercial web APIs and their robustness has not yet been thoroughly investigated. This work provides a measurement study on the robustness of black-box commercial face recognition APIs against Deepfake Impersonation (DI) attacks using celebrity recognition APIs as an example case study. We use five deepfake datasets, two of which are created by us and planned to be released. More specifically, we measure attack performance based on two scenarios (targeted and non-targeted) and further analyze the differing system behaviors using fidelity, confidence, and similarity metrics. Accordingly, we demonstrate how vulnerable face recognition technologies from popular companies are to DI attack, achieving maximum success rates of 78.0% and 99.9% for targeted (i.e., precise match) and non-targeted (i.e., match with any celebrity) attacks, respectively. Moreover, we propose practical defense strategies to mitigate DI attacks, reducing the attack success rates to as low as 0% and 0.02% for targeted and non-targeted attacks, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2021.

Builds on

15 of 71 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  3. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
  4. 2018VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 862
  5. 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 714
  6. 2020First Order Motion Model for Image Animationcited by 698
  7. 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
  8. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  9. 2019Few-Shot Adversarial Learning of Realistic Neural Talking Head Modelscited by 284
  10. 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 246
  11. 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 173
  12. 2021LowKey: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Social Media Users from Facial Recognitioncited by 92
3 more
  1. 2020Detecting Deep-Fake Videos from Appearance and Behaviorcited by 66
  2. 2020A Convolutional LSTM based Residual Network for Deepfake Video Detectioncited by 26
  3. 2019FakeSpotter: A Simple yet Robust Baseline for Spotting AI-Synthesized Fake Facescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

12 papers.