mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SENTINEL: Taming Uncertainty with Ensemble-based Distributional Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2102.11075 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2021cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we consider risk-sensitive sequential decision-making in Reinforcement Learning (RL). Our contributions are two-fold. First, we introduce a novel and coherent quantification of risk, namely composite risk, which quantifies the joint effect of aleatory and epistemic risk during the learning process. Existing works considered either aleatory or epistemic risk individually, or as an additive combination. We prove that the additive formulation is a particular case of the composite risk when the epistemic risk measure is replaced with expectation. Thus, the composite risk is more sensitive to both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty than the individual and additive formulations. We also propose an algorithm, SENTINEL-K, based on ensemble bootstrapping and distributional RL for representing epistemic and aleatory uncertainty respectively. The ensemble of K learners uses Follow The Regularised Leader (FTRL) to aggregate the return distributions and obtain the composite risk. We experimentally verify that SENTINEL-K estimates the return distribution better, and while used with composite risk estimates, demonstrates higher risk-sensitive performance than state-of-the-art risk-sensitive and distributional RL algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2021.

Builds on

17 of 52 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  2. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  3. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
  4. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
  5. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  6. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
  7. 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 162
  8. 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
  9. 2014Optimizing the CVaR via Samplingcited by 98
  10. 2014Algorithms for CVaR Optimization in MDPscited by 98
  11. 2017Virtual to Real Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 79
  12. 2019Estimating Risk and Uncertainty in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
5 more
  1. 2018Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Real-World Robotscited by 64
  2. 2019Statistics and Samples in Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 62
  3. 2019Epistemic Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  4. 2018Exploration by Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  5. 2018Concentration bounds for empirical conditional value-at-risk: The unbounded casecited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: