mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SAAC: Safe Reinforcement Learning as an Adversarial Game of Actor-Critics

arXiv 2204.09424 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.GTcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although Reinforcement Learning (RL) is effective for sequential decision-making problems under uncertainty, it still fails to thrive in real-world systems where risk or safety is a binding constraint. In this paper, we formulate the RL problem with safety constraints as a non-zero-sum game. While deployed with maximum entropy RL, this formulation leads to a safe adversarially guided soft actor-critic framework, called SAAC. In SAAC, the adversary aims to break the safety constraint while the RL agent aims to maximize the constrained value function given the adversary's policy. The safety constraint on the agent's value function manifests only as a repulsion term between the agent's and the adversary's policies. Unlike previous approaches, SAAC can address different safety criteria such as safe exploration, mean-variance risk sensitivity, and CVaR-like coherent risk sensitivity. We illustrate the design of the adversary for these constraints. Then, in each of these variations, we show the agent differentiates itself from the adversary's unsafe actions in addition to learning to solve the task. Finally, for challenging continuous control tasks, we demonstrate that SAAC achieves faster convergence, better efficiency, and fewer failures to satisfy the safety constraints than risk-averse distributional RL and risk-neutral soft actor-critic algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2022.

Builds on

24 of 47 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  2. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
  4. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 956
  5. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
  6. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 474
  7. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 451
  8. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 337
  9. 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 182
  10. 2018Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimizationcited by 176
  11. 2021Maximum Entropy RL (Provably) Solves Some Robust RL Problemscited by 176
  12. 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 175
12 more
  1. 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 170
  2. 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 165
  3. 2018Learning-based Model Predictive Control for Safe Explorationcited by 120
  4. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 115
  5. 2016A Differentiable Physics Engine for Deep Learning in Roboticscited by 108
  6. 2014Algorithms for CVaR Optimization in MDPscited by 99
  7. 2017Virtual to Real Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 80
  8. 2020An empirical investigation of the challenges of real-world reinforcement learningcited by 77
  9. 2016Safe Learning of Regions of Attraction for Uncertain, Nonlinear Systems with Gaussian Processescited by 39
  10. 2014Variance-Constrained Actor-Critic Algorithms for Discounted and Average Reward MDPscited by 28
  11. 2019If MaxEnt RL is the Answer, What is the Question?cited by 27
  12. 2021SENTINEL: Taming Uncertainty with Ensemble-based Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

6 papers.