mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks?

arXiv 2102.09671 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The question of how and why the phenomenon of mode connectivity occurs in training deep neural networks has gained remarkable attention in the research community. From a theoretical perspective, two possible explanations have been proposed: (i) the loss function has connected sublevel sets, and (ii) the solutions found by stochastic gradient descent are dropout stable. While these explanations provide insights into the phenomenon, their assumptions are not always satisfied in practice. In particular, the first approach requires the network to have one layer with order of N neurons (N being the number of training samples), while the second one requires the loss to be almost invariant after removing half of the neurons at each layer (up to some rescaling of the remaining ones). In this work, we improve both conditions by exploiting the quality of the features at every intermediate layer together with a milder over-parameterization condition. More specifically, we show that: (i) under generic assumptions on the features of intermediate layers, it suffices that the last two hidden layers have order of √N neurons, and (ii) if subsets of features at each layer are linearly separable, then no over-parameterization is needed to show the connectivity. Our experiments confirm that the proposed condition ensures the connectivity of solutions found by stochastic gradient descent, even in settings where the previous requirements do not hold.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2021.

Builds on

39 of 66 references.

References · 39

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
  3. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  4. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
  5. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
  6. 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 304
  7. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
  8. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
  9. 2019Towards moderate overparameterization: global convergence guarantees for training shallow neural networkscited by 176
  10. 2018Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimizes Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 139
  11. 2016Identity Matters in Deep Learningcited by 107
  12. 2017Spurious Local Minima are Common in Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networkscited by 104
27 more
  1. 2016Topology and Geometry of Half-Rectified Network Optimizationcited by 102
  2. 2020The Interpolation Phase Transition in Neural Networks: Memorization and Generalization under Lazy Trainingcited by 84
  3. 2018Small ReLU networks are powerful memorizers: a tight analysis of memorization capacitycited by 76
  4. 2017The loss surface of deep and wide neural networkscited by 74
  5. 2019Large Scale Structure of Neural Network Loss Landscapescited by 68
  6. 2020Global Convergence of Deep Networks with One Wide Layer Followed by Pyramidal Topologycited by 66
  7. 2017Deep linear neural networks with arbitrary loss: All local minima are globalcited by 64
  8. 2019Explaining Landscape Connectivity of Low-cost Solutions for Multilayer Netscited by 63
  9. 2019Weight-space symmetry in deep networks gives rise to permutation saddles, connected by equal-loss valleys across the loss landscapecited by 61
  10. 2019On Connected Sublevel Sets in Deep Learningcited by 51
  11. 2019Landscape Connectivity and Dropout Stability of SGD Solutions for Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 35
  12. 2016Diverse Neural Network Learns True Target Functionscited by 33
  13. 2017Global optimality conditions for deep neural networkscited by 31
  14. 2017Depth Creates No Bad Local Minimacited by 29
  15. 2019Semi-flat minima and saddle points by embedding neural networks to overparameterizationcited by 29
  16. 2018Small nonlinearities in activation functions create bad local minima in neural networkscited by 28
  17. 2018Understanding the Loss Surface of Neural Networks for Binary Classificationcited by 27
  18. 2018Adding One Neuron Can Eliminate All Bad Local Minimacited by 21
  19. 2019Truth or Backpropaganda? An Empirical Investigation of Deep Learning Theorycited by 21
  20. 2015On the Quality of the Initial Basin in Overspecified Neural Networkscited by 20
  21. 2017Exponentially vanishing sub-optimal local minima in multilayer neural networkscited by 19
  22. 2020Piecewise linear activations substantially shape the loss surfaces of neural networkscited by 19
  23. 2018Depth with Nonlinearity Creates No Bad Local Minima in ResNetscited by 17
  24. 2020Network size and weights size for memorization with two-layers neural networkscited by 16
  25. 2021A Note on Connectivity of Sublevel Sets in Deep Learningcited by 8
  26. 2019Mildly Overparametrized Neural Nets can Memorize Training Data Efficientlycited by 7
  27. 2020Low-loss connection of weight vectors: distribution-based approachescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.