mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Note on Connectivity of Sublevel Sets in Deep Learning

arXiv 2101.08576 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is shown that for deep neural networks, a single wide layer of width N+1 (N being the number of training samples) suffices to prove the connectivity of sublevel sets of the training loss function. In the two-layer setting, the same property may not hold even if one has just one neuron less (i.e. width N can lead to disconnected sublevel sets).

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2021.

Builds on

10 of 14 references.

References · 10

  1. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
  2. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
  3. 2016Topology and Geometry of Half-Rectified Network Optimizationcited by 102
  4. 2017The loss surface of deep and wide neural networkscited by 74
  5. 2019Explaining Landscape Connectivity of Low-cost Solutions for Multilayer Netscited by 63
  6. 2019On Connected Sublevel Sets in Deep Learningcited by 51
  7. 2018On the loss landscape of a class of deep neural networks with no bad local valleyscited by 38
  8. 2019Landscape Connectivity and Dropout Stability of SGD Solutions for Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 35
  9. 2018Small nonlinearities in activation functions create bad local minima in neural networkscited by 28
  10. 2018Spurious Valleys in Two-layer Neural Network Optimization Landscapescited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

8 papers.