mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the Loss Surface of Neural Networks for Binary Classification

arXiv 1803.00909 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2018cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is widely conjectured that the reason that training algorithms for neural networks are successful because all local minima lead to similar performance, for example, see (LeCun et al., 2015, Choromanska et al., 2015, Dauphin et al., 2014). Performance is typically measured in terms of two metrics: training performance and generalization performance. Here we focus on the training performance of single-layered neural networks for binary classification, and provide conditions under which the training error is zero at all local minima of a smooth hinge loss function. Our conditions are roughly in the following form: the neurons have to be strictly convex and the surrogate loss function should be a smooth version of hinge loss. We also provide counterexamples to show that when the loss function is replaced with quadratic loss or logistic loss, the result may not hold.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 6; 2025: 2.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Frameworkcited by 106
  2. 2024ARGS: Alignment as Reward-Guided Searchcited by 99
  3. 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankingscited by 78
  4. 2023Going Beyond Linear Mode Connectivity: The Layerwise Linear Feature Connectivitycited by 50
  5. 2023NTK-SAP: Improving neural network pruning by aligning training dynamicscited by 30
  6. 2024On the Emergence of Cross-Task Linearity in the Pretraining-Finetuning Paradigmcited by 25
  7. 2021Noise-robust Graph Learning by Estimating and Leveraging Pairwise Interactionscited by 20
  8. 2023Joint Edge-Model Sparse Learning is Provably Efficient for Graph Neural Networkscited by 16
  9. 2021Noisy Gradient Descent Converges to Flat Minima for Nonconvex Matrix Factorizationcited by 15
  10. 2024Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human Feedbackcited by 15
  11. 2021When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks?cited by 10
  12. 2022When Expressivity Meets Trainability: Fewer than n Neurons Can Workcited by 8
15 more
  1. 2024On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 8
  2. 2021Spurious Local Minima Are Common for Deep Neural Networks with Piecewise Linear Activationscited by 7
  3. 2021ResNEsts and DenseNEsts: Block-based DNN Models with Improved Representation Guaranteescited by 6
  4. 2024Topological obstruction to the training of shallow ReLU neural networkscited by 6
  5. 2021A Convergence Theory Towards Practical Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networkscited by 4
  6. 2021Achieving Small Test Error in Mildly Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 3
  7. 2021Theoretical Exploration of Flexible Transmitter Modelcited by 3
  8. 2023Empirical Loss Landscape Analysis of Neural Network Activation Functionscited by 2
  9. 2025Analyzing the Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivitycited by 2
  10. 2021WGAN with an Infinitely Wide Generator Has No Spurious Stationary Pointscited by 1
  11. 2022Deep learning, stochastic gradient descent and diffusion mapscited by 1
  12. 2022Xtreme Margin: A Tunable Loss Function for Binary Classification Problemscited by 1
  13. 2025SE-Merging: A Self-Enhanced Approach for Dynamic Model Mergingcited by 1
  14. 2022Global Convergence Analysis of Deep Linear Networks with A One-neuron Layercited by 0
  15. 2022Complexity from Adaptive-Symmetries Breaking: Global Minima in the Statistical Mechanics of Deep Neural Networkscited by 0