Evaluating Multi-label Classifiers with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-label classification (MLC) is a generalization of standard classification where multiple labels may be assigned to a given sample. In the real world, it is more common to deal with noisy datasets than clean datasets, given how modern datasets are labeled by a large group of annotators on crowdsourcing platforms, but little attention has been given to evaluating multi-label classifiers with noisy labels. Exploiting label correlations now becomes a standard component of a multi-label classifier to achieve competitive performance. However, this component makes the classifier more prone to poor generalization - it overfits labels as well as label dependencies. We identify three common real-world label noise scenarios and show how previous approaches per-form poorly with noisy labels. To address this issue, we present a Context-Based Multi-LabelClassifier (CbMLC) that effectively handles noisy labels when learning label dependencies, without requiring additional supervision. We compare CbMLC against other domain-specific state-of-the-art models on a variety of datasets, under both the clean and the noisy settings. We show CbMLC yields substantial improvements over the previous methods in most cases.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.
Builds on
30 of 68 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 379
- 2019Multi-Label Image Recognition with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 320
- 2016CNN-RNN: A Unified Framework for Multi-label Image Classificationcited by 189
18 more
- 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
- 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
- 2019Cross-Modality Attention with Semantic Graph Embedding for Multi-Label Classificationcited by 78
- 2018Joint Embedding of Words and Labels for Text Classificationcited by 69
- 2019Multi-Label Classification with Label Graph Superimposingcited by 65
- 2013Deep Convolutional Ranking for Multilabel Image Annotationcited by 47
- 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
- 2013Large-scale Multi-label Text Classification - Revisiting Neural Networkscited by 35
- 2017Learning Spread-out Local Feature Descriptorscited by 34
- 2020Towards Noise-resistant Object Detection with Noisy Annotationscited by 24
- 2019An Effective Label Noise Model for DNN Text Classificationcited by 22
- 2020Disentangled Variational Autoencoder based Multi-Label Classification with Covariance-Aware Multivariate Probit Modelcited by 22
- 2016Deep Multi-Species Embeddingcited by 20
- 2019Neural Message Passing for Multi-Label Classificationcited by 20
- 2018Efficient Training on Very Large Corpora via Gramian Estimationcited by 9
- 2018End-to-End Learning for the Deep Multivariate Probit Modelcited by 8
- 2017WebVision Challenge: Visual Learning and Understanding With Web Datacited by 7
- 2017Multi-Entity Dependence Learning with Rich Context via Conditional Variational Auto-encodercited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022On the Effects of Different Types of Label Noise in Multi-Label Remote Sensing Image Classificationcited by 17
- 2023Toward Robustness in Multi-label Classification: A Data Augmentation Strategy against Imbalance and Noisecited by 11
- 2022BoMD: Bag of Multi-label Descriptors for Noisy Chest X-ray Classificationcited by 9
- 2023ATLAS: Automatically Detecting Discrepancies Between Privacy Policies and Privacy Labelscited by 5
- 2021Multi-Label Gold Asymmetric Loss Correction with Single-Label Regulatorscited by 1
- 2023DOST -- Domain Obedient Self-supervised Training for Multi Label Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 1
- 2023Pushing One Pair of Labels Apart Each Time in Multi-Label Learning: From Single Positive to Full Labelscited by 0
- 2024When the Small-Loss Trick is Not Enough: Multi-Label Image Classification with Noisy Labels Applied to CCTV Sewer Inspectionscited by 0
- 2026Noise-Adaptive Regularization for Robust Multi-Label Remote Sensing Image Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Noise-Adaptive Regularization for Robust Multi-Label Remote Sensing Image Classification13 Jan 2026
- 2024When the Small-Loss Trick is Not Enough: Multi-Label Image Classification with Noisy Labels Applied to CCTV Sewer Inspections10 Oct 2024
- 2023Toward Robustness in Multi-label Classification: A Data Augmentation Strategy against Imbalance and Noise12 Dec 2023
- 2023DOST -- Domain Obedient Self-supervised Training for Multi Label Classification with Noisy Labels9 Aug 2023
- 2023ATLAS: Automatically Detecting Discrepancies Between Privacy Policies and Privacy Labels24 May 2023
- 2023Pushing One Pair of Labels Apart Each Time in Multi-Label Learning: From Single Positive to Full Labels28 Feb 2023
- 2022On the Effects of Different Types of Label Noise in Multi-Label Remote Sensing Image Classification28 Jul 2022
- 2022BoMD: Bag of Multi-label Descriptors for Noisy Chest X-ray Classification3 Mar 2022
- 2021Multi-Label Gold Asymmetric Loss Correction with Single-Label Regulators4 Aug 2021