Multi-Label Gold Asymmetric Loss Correction with Single-Label Regulators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-label learning is an emerging extension of the multi-class classification where an image contains multiple labels. Not only acquiring a clean and fully labeled dataset in multi-label learning is extremely expensive, but also many of the actual labels are corrupted or missing due to the automated or non-expert annotation techniques. Noisy label data decrease the prediction performance drastically. In this paper, we propose a novel Gold Asymmetric Loss Correction with Single-Label Regulators (GALC-SLR) that operates robust against noisy labels. GALC-SLR estimates the noise confusion matrix using single-label samples, then constructs an asymmetric loss correction via estimated confusion matrix to avoid overfitting to the noisy labels. Empirical results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art original asymmetric loss multi-label classifier under all corruption levels, showing mean average precision improvement up to 28.67% on a real world dataset of MS-COCO, yielding a better generalization of the unseen data and increased prediction performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2021.
Builds on
29 of 38 references.
References · 29
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
17 more
- 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 379
- 2019Multi-Label Image Recognition with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 320
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2020General Multi-label Image Classification with Transformerscited by 126
- 2020TResNet: High Performance GPU-Dedicated Architecturecited by 119
- 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
- 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
- 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 67
- 2019Multi-Label Classification with Label Graph Superimposingcited by 65
- 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
- 2020Towards Noise-resistant Object Detection with Noisy Annotationscited by 24
- 2020Disentangled Variational Autoencoder based Multi-Label Classification with Covariance-Aware Multivariate Probit Modelcited by 22
- 2021Evaluating Multi-label Classifiers with Noisy Labelscited by 9
- 2021Towards the Memorization Effect of Neural Networks in Adversarial Trainingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.