mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pushing One Pair of Labels Apart Each Time in Multi-Label Learning: From Single Positive to Full Labels

arXiv 2302.14695 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Multi-Label Learning (MLL), it is extremely challenging to accurately annotate every appearing object due to expensive costs and limited knowledge. When facing such a challenge, a more practical and cheaper alternative should be Single Positive Multi-Label Learning (SPMLL), where only one positive label needs to be provided per sample. Existing SPMLL methods usually assume unknown labels as negatives, which inevitably introduces false negatives as noisy labels. More seriously, Binary Cross Entropy (BCE) loss is often used for training, which is notoriously not robust to noisy labels. To mitigate this issue, we customize an objective function for SPMLL by pushing only one pair of labels apart each time to prevent the domination of negative labels, which is the main culprit of fitting noisy labels in SPMLL. To further combat such noisy labels, we explore the high-rankness of label matrix, which can also push apart different labels. By directly extending from SPMLL to MLL with full labels, a unified loss applicable to both settings is derived. Experiments on real datasets demonstrate that the proposed loss not only performs more robustly to noisy labels for SPMLL but also works well for full labels. Besides, we empirically discover that high-rankness can mitigate the dramatic performance drop in SPMLL. Most surprisingly, even without any regularization or fine-tuned label correction, only adopting our loss defeats state-of-the-art SPMLL methods on CUB, a dataset that severely lacks labels.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2023.

Builds on

32 of 67 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  6. 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 379
  7. 2019Multi-Label Image Recognition with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 320
  8. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  9. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  10. 2016CNN-RNN: A Unified Framework for Multi-label Image Classificationcited by 189
  11. 2020General Multi-label Image Classification with Transformerscited by 126
  12. 2020Distribution-Balanced Loss for Multi-Label Classification in Long-Tailed Datasetscited by 122
20 more
  1. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  2. 2020The Emerging Trends of Multi-Label Learningcited by 99
  3. 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
  4. 2017Learning Spatial Regularization with Image-level Supervisions for Multi-label Image Classificationcited by 85
  5. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  6. 2021Multi-Label Learning from Single Positive Labelscited by 81
  7. 2021Fast Multi-Resolution Transformer Fine-tuning for Extreme Multi-label Text Classificationcited by 66
  8. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
  9. 2022Large Loss Matters in Weakly Supervised Multi-Label Classificationcited by 38
  10. 2018Multi-Label Image Classification via Knowledge Distillation from Weakly-Supervised Detectioncited by 37
  11. 2016A Unified View of Multi-Label Performance Measurescited by 36
  12. 2019Hyperbolic Interaction Model For Hierarchical Multi-Label Classificationcited by 30
  13. 2022Acknowledging the Unknown for Multi-label Learning with Single Positive Labelscited by 24
  14. 2022One Positive Label is Sufficient: Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning with Label Enhancementcited by 22
  15. 2020A Concise yet Effective model for Non-Aligned Incomplete Multi-view and Missing Multi-label Learningcited by 19
  16. 2022ZLPR: A Novel Loss for Multi-label Classificationcited by 16
  17. 2020Multi-Label Activity Recognition using Activity-specific Features and Activity Correlationscited by 15
  18. 2021Evaluating Multi-label Classifiers with Noisy Labelscited by 9
  19. 2021Learning to Focus: Cascaded Feature Matching Network for Few-shot Image Recognitioncited by 4
  20. 2022Mining Multi-Label Samples from Single Positive Labelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.