mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When the Small-Loss Trick is Not Enough: Multi-Label Image Classification with Noisy Labels Applied to CCTV Sewer Inspections

arXiv 2410.07689 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The maintenance of sewerage networks, with their millions of kilometers of pipe, heavily relies on efficient Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) inspections. Many promising approaches based on multi-label image classification have leveraged databases of historical inspection reports to automate these inspections. However, the significant presence of label noise in these databases, although known, has not been addressed. While extensive research has explored the issue of label noise in singlelabel classification (SLC), little attention has been paid to label noise in multi-label classification (MLC). To address this, we first adapted three sample selection SLC methods (Co-teaching, CoSELFIE, and DISC) that have proven robust to label noise. Our findings revealed that sample selection based solely on the small-loss trick can handle complex label noise, but it is sub-optimal. Adapting hybrid sample selection methods to noisy MLC appeared to be a more promising approach. In light of this, we developed a novel method named MHSS (Multi-label Hybrid Sample Selection) based on CoSELFIE. Through an in-depth comparative study, we demonstrated the superior performance of our approach in dealing with both synthetic complex noise and real noise, thus contributing to the ongoing efforts towards effective automation of CCTV sewer pipe inspections.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

25 of 61 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  6. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
  7. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  10. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 613
  11. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  12. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
13 more
  1. 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 381
  2. 2019Multi-Label Image Recognition with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 322
  3. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  4. 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 226
  5. 2020TResNet: High Performance GPU-Dedicated Architecturecited by 119
  6. 2020Attention-Driven Dynamic Graph Convolutional Network for Multi-Label Image Recognitioncited by 80
  7. 2019Multi-Label Classification with Label Graph Superimposingcited by 65
  8. 2020Label Noise Types and Their Effects on Deep Learningcited by 29
  9. 2021Self-Adaptive Training: Bridging Supervised and Self-Supervised Learningcited by 17
  10. 2021Sewer-ML: A Multi-Label Sewer Defect Classification Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 17
  11. 2022On the Effects of Different Types of Label Noise in Multi-Label Remote Sensing Image Classificationcited by 17
  12. 2021Evaluating Multi-label Classifiers with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  13. 2021CCMN: A General Framework for Learning with Class-Conditional Multi-Label Noisecited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.