mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Facilitating Knowledge Sharing from Domain Experts to Data Scientists for Building NLP Models

arXiv 2102.00036 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2021cs.HC cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data scientists face a steep learning curve in understanding a new domain for which they want to build machine learning (ML) models. While input from domain experts could offer valuable help, such input is often limited, expensive, and generally not in a form readily consumable by a model development pipeline. In this paper, we propose Ziva, a framework to guide domain experts in sharing essential domain knowledge to data scientists for building NLP models. With Ziva, experts are able to distill and share their domain knowledge using domain concept extractors and five types of label justification over a representative data sample. The design of Ziva is informed by preliminary interviews with data scientists, in order to understand current practices of domain knowledge acquisition process for ML development projects. To assess our design, we run a mix-method case-study to evaluate how Ziva can facilitate interaction of domain experts and data scientists. Our results highlight that (1) domain experts are able to use Ziva to provide rich domain knowledge, while maintaining low mental load and stress levels; and (2) data scientists find Ziva's output helpful for learning essential information about the domain, offering scalability of information, and lowering the burden on domain experts to share knowledge. We conclude this work by experimenting with building NLP models using the Ziva output by our case study.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2021.

Builds on

23 of 88 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  2. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  3. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  6. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
  7. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  8. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  9. 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
  10. 2019Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Makingcited by 109
  11. 2020How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Toolscited by 64
  12. 2017Neural Ranking Models with Weak Supervisioncited by 61
11 more
  1. 2019Few-shot Text Classification with Distributional Signaturescited by 58
  2. 2019Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processescited by 53
  3. 2018Manifold: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Interpretation and Diagnosis of Machine Learning Modelscited by 50
  4. 2017Machine Teaching: A New Paradigm for Building Machine Learning Systemscited by 41
  5. 2018FactSheets: Increasing Trust in AI Services through Supplier's Declarations of Conformitycited by 31
  6. 2019How Data Scientists Work Together With Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations: To Find The Right Answer Or To Ask The Right Question?cited by 30
  7. 2021How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Studycited by 29
  8. 2020Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experiencecited by 20
  9. 2018Recent Research Advances on Interactive Machine Learningcited by 17
  10. 2016Learning Concept Taxonomies from Multi-modal Datacited by 6
  11. 2019Machine Teaching by Domain Experts: Towards More Humane,Inclusive, and Intelligent Machine Learning Systemscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

12 papers.