mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep-Bench: Deep Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Generation

arXiv 2502.18726 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning (DL) has revolutionized areas such as computer vision, natural language processing, and more. However, developing DL systems is challenging due to the complexity of DL workflows. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT, Claude, Llama, Mistral, etc., have emerged as promising tools to assist in DL code generation, offering potential solutions to these challenges. Despite this, existing benchmarks such as DS-1000 are limited, as they primarily focus on small DL code snippets related to pre/post-processing tasks and lack a comprehensive coverage of the full DL pipeline, including different DL phases and input data types. To address this, we introduce DeepBench, a novel benchmark dataset designed for function-level DL code generation. DeepBench categorizes DL problems based on three key aspects: phases such as pre-processing, model construction, and training; tasks, including classification, regression, and recommendation; and input data types such as tabular, image, and text. GPT-4o -- the state-of-the-art LLM -- achieved 31% accuracy on DeepBench, significantly lower than its 60% on DS-1000. We observed similar difficulty for other LLMs (e.g., 28% vs. 54% for Claude, 21% vs. 41% for LLaMA, and 15% vs. 20% for Mistral). This result underscores DeepBench's greater complexity. We also construct a taxonomy of issues and bugs found in LLM-generated DL code, which highlights the distinct challenges that LLMs face when generating DL code compared to general code. Furthermore, our analysis also reveals substantial performance variations across categories, with differences of up to 7% among phases and 37% among tasks. These disparities suggest that DeepBench offers valuable insights into the LLMs' performance and areas for potential improvement in the DL domain.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

37 of 60 references.

References · 37

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  4. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  5. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  6. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  7. 2020CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languagescited by 1,286
  8. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  9. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
  10. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
  11. 2021CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 732
  12. 2019Panoptic Feature Pyramid Networkscited by 644
25 more
  1. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
  2. 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 442
  3. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 429
  4. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 428
  5. 2023RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generationcited by 357
  6. 2020Time Series Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 225
  7. 2023Using an LLM to Help With Code Understandingcited by 222
  8. 2018Deep learning in agriculture: A surveycited by 160
  9. 2022MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Extensible Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generationcited by 132
  10. 2024The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinismcited by 113
  11. 2022Repository-Level Prompt Generation for Large Language Models of Codecited by 106
  12. 2019A Comprehensive Study on Deep Learning Bug Characteristicscited by 65
  13. 2024Bugs in Large Language Models Generated Code: An Empirical Studycited by 59
  14. 2017Deep Learning for Time-Series Analysiscited by 55
  15. 2019Does BLEU Score Work for Code Migration?cited by 49
  16. 2019JuICe: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Dataset for Open Domain Context-based Code Generationcited by 49
  17. 2018Software Engineering Challenges of Deep Learningcited by 41
  18. 2022AixBench: A Code Generation Benchmark Datasetcited by 22
  19. 2021Facilitating Knowledge Sharing from Domain Experts to Data Scientists for Building NLP Modelscited by 12
  20. 2024Top Pass: Improve Code Generation by Pass@k-Maximized Code Rankingcited by 9
  21. 2024Using Prompts to Guide Large Language Models in Imitating a Real Person's Language Stylecited by 6
  22. 2023The Good, the Bad, and the Missing: Neural Code Generation for Machine Learning Taskscited by 5
  23. 2024Unraveling Code Clone Dynamics in Deep Learning Frameworkscited by 2
  24. 2021Automating Test Case Identification in Java Open Source Projects on GitHubcited by 1
  25. 2024Frontiers of Deep Learning: From Novel Application to Real-World Deploymentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.