Alignment and stability of embeddings: measurement and inference improvement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Representation learning (RL) methods learn objects' latent embeddings where information is preserved by distances. Since distances are invariant to certain linear transformations, one may obtain different embeddings while preserving the same information. In dynamic systems, a temporal difference in embeddings may be explained by the stability of the system or by the misalignment of embeddings due to arbitrary transformations. In the literature, embedding alignment has not been defined formally, explored theoretically, or analyzed empirically. Here, we explore the embedding alignment and its parts, provide the first formal definitions, propose novel metrics to measure alignment and stability, and show their suitability through synthetic experiments. Real-world experiments show that both static and dynamic RL methods are prone to produce misaligned embeddings and such misalignment worsens the performance of dynamic network inference tasks. By ensuring alignment, the prediction accuracy raises by up to 90% in static and by 40% in dynamic RL methods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2021.
Builds on
20 of 54 references.
References · 20
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
- 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
- 2015LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embeddingcited by 582
- 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
- 2017A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques and Applicationscited by 260
- 2019Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Surveycited by 260
- 2017Graph Embedding Techniques, Applications, and Performance: A Surveycited by 188
- 2017A Survey on Network Embeddingcited by 142
- 2018DynGEM: Deep Embedding Method for Dynamic Graphscited by 100
- 2014Statistically Significant Detection of Linguistic Changecited by 82
- 2021A Survey on Embedding Dynamic Graphscited by 60
8 more
- 2015Contact patterns in a high school: a comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveyscited by 59
- 2019Node Embedding over Temporal Graphscited by 45
- 2018dynnode2vec: Scalable Dynamic Network Embeddingcited by 32
- 2019A Comparative Study for Unsupervised Network Representation Learningcited by 16
- 2020GloDyNE: Global Topology Preserving Dynamic Network Embeddingcited by 8
- 2019Dynamic Network Embeddings for Network Evolution Analysiscited by 3
- 2019Link prediction in dynamic networks using random dot product graphscited by 3
- 2019Change Detection in Noisy Dynamic Networks: A Spectral Embedding Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality Gapcited by 7
- 2023Geometric instability of graph neural networks on large graphscited by 2
- 2026Layer-wise Representation Dynamics: An Empirical Investigation Across Embedders and Base LLMscited by 1
- 2022Investigating internal migration with network analysis and latent space representations: An application to Turkeycited by 0
- 2026Layer-wise Representation Dynamics: An Empirical Investigation Across Embedders and Base LLMs12 May 2026
- 2024I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality Gap18 Dec 2024
- 2023Geometric instability of graph neural networks on large graphs19 Aug 2023
- 2022Investigating internal migration with network analysis and latent space representations: An application to Turkey10 Jan 2022