I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality Gap
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) enables zero-shot inference in downstream tasks such as image-text retrieval and classification. However, recent works extending CLIP suffer from the issue of modality gap, which arises when the image and text embeddings are projected to disparate manifolds, deviating from the intended objective of image-text contrastive learning. We discover that this phenomenon is linked to the modality-specific characteristic that each image/text encoder independently possesses and propose two methods to address the modality gap: (1) a post-hoc embedding standardization method, I0Tpost that reduces the modality gap approximately to zero and (2) a trainable method, I0Tasync, to alleviate the modality gap problem by adding two normalization layers for each encoder. Our I0T framework can significantly reduce the modality gap while preserving the original embedding representations of trained models with their locked parameters. In practice, I0Tpost can serve as an alternative explainable automatic evaluation metric of widely used CLIPScore (CLIP-S).
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2024.
Builds on
26 of 44 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,000
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
- 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 636
- 2021VideoCLIP: Contrastive Pre-training for Zero-shot Video-Text Understandingcited by 596
14 more
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
- 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 461
- 2022Scaling Language-Image Pre-training via Maskingcited by 317
- 2023Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Image and Video Captioning Evaluationcited by 78
- 2023SoftCLIP: Softer Cross-modal Alignment Makes CLIP Strongercited by 56
- 2023Understanding and Constructing Latent Modality Structures in Multi-modal Representation Learningcited by 53
- 2024FLEUR: An Explainable Reference-Free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning Using a Large Multimodal Modelcited by 44
- 2022Geodesic Multi-Modal Mixup for Robust Fine-Tuningcited by 29
- 2024It's Not a Modality Gap: Characterizing and Addressing the Contrastive Gapcited by 26
- 2023InfoMetIC: An Informative Metric for Reference-free Image Caption Evaluationcited by 25
- 2024Mitigate the Gap: Investigating Approaches for Improving Cross-Modal Alignment in CLIPcited by 23
- 2022MCSE: Multimodal Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 22
- 2021Alignment and stability of embeddings: measurement and inference improvementcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2026Interpretable Debiasing of Vision-Language Models for Social Fairnesscited by 6
- 2026TextME: Bridging Unseen Modalities Through Text Descriptionscited by 2
- 2026One Single Hub Text Breaks CLIP: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Cross-Modal Encoders via Hubnesscited by 2
- 2025How Blind and Low-Vision Individuals Prefer Large Vision-Language Model-Generated Scene Descriptionscited by 0
- 2026The Geometry of Compromise: Unlocking Generative Capabilities via Controllable Modality Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026COMET: Concept Space Dissection of the Modality Gap in Audio-Text Multimodal Contrastive Embeddingscited by 0
- 2026When Modality Gap Reduction Fails: Prediction-Level Hubness in CLIPcited by 0
- 2026When Modality Gap Reduction Fails: Prediction-Level Hubness in CLIP1 Sep 2026
- 2026COMET: Concept Space Dissection of the Modality Gap in Audio-Text Multimodal Contrastive Embeddings28 May 2026
- 2026One Single Hub Text Breaks CLIP: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Cross-Modal Encoders via Hubness30 Apr 2026
- 2026The Geometry of Compromise: Unlocking Generative Capabilities via Controllable Modality Alignment31 Mar 2026
- 2026Interpretable Debiasing of Vision-Language Models for Social Fairness27 Feb 2026
- 2026TextME: Bridging Unseen Modalities Through Text Descriptions3 Feb 2026
- 2025How Blind and Low-Vision Individuals Prefer Large Vision-Language Model-Generated Scene Descriptions15 Feb 2025