mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Symmetric Loss Perspective of Reliable Machine Learning

arXiv 2101.01366 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When minimizing the empirical risk in binary classification, it is a common practice to replace the zero-one loss with a surrogate loss to make the learning objective feasible to optimize. Examples of well-known surrogate losses for binary classification include the logistic loss, hinge loss, and sigmoid loss. It is known that the choice of a surrogate loss can highly influence the performance of the trained classifier and therefore it should be carefully chosen. Recently, surrogate losses that satisfy a certain symmetric condition (aka., symmetric losses) have demonstrated their usefulness in learning from corrupted labels. In this article, we provide an overview of symmetric losses and their applications. First, we review how a symmetric loss can yield robust classification from corrupted labels in balanced error rate (BER) minimization and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) maximization. Then, we demonstrate how the robust AUC maximization method can benefit natural language processing in the problem where we want to learn only from relevant keywords and unlabeled documents. Finally, we conclude this article by discussing future directions, including potential applications of symmetric losses for reliable machine learning and the design of non-symmetric losses that can benefit from the symmetric condition.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 149 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2021.

Builds on

59 of 149 references.

References · 59

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  5. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 770
  6. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  7. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  8. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  9. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
  10. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 310
  11. 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 271
  12. 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 260
38 more
  1. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  2. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
  3. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  4. 2018Open Set Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 150
  5. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  6. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
  7. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  8. 2019Imitation Learning from Imperfect Demonstrationcited by 114
  9. 2020A survey on domain adaptation theory: learning bounds and theoretical guaranteescited by 109
  10. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  11. 2019Multi-class Classification without Multi-class Labelscited by 100
  12. 2020Safe Imitation Learning via Fast Bayesian Reward Inference from Preferencescited by 73
  13. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
  14. 2014Spectral Methods meet EM: A Provably Optimal Algorithm for Crowdsourcingcited by 63
  15. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  16. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  17. 2020Classification with Rejection Based on Cost-sensitive Classificationcited by 55
  18. 2014Making Risk Minimization Tolerant to Label Noisecited by 54
  19. 2019On Symmetric Losses for Learning from Corrupted Labelscited by 53
  20. 2019Open Set Domain Adaptation: Theoretical Bound and Algorithmcited by 48
  21. 2020When Optimizing f-divergence is Robust with Label Noisecited by 44
  22. 2018On the Minimal Supervision for Training Any Binary Classifier from Only Unlabeled Datacited by 43
  23. 2016Theoretical Comparisons of Positive-Unlabeled Learning against Positive-Negative Learningcited by 41
  24. 2019On the Calibration of Multiclass Classification with Rejectioncited by 41
  25. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  26. 2020FIND: Human-in-the-Loop Debugging Deep Text Classifierscited by 40
  27. 2018Classification from Pairwise Similarity and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
  28. 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
  29. 2019A Crowdsourcing Framework for On-Device Federated Learningcited by 32
  30. 2020Learning from Aggregate Observationscited by 30
  31. 2019Mitigating Overfitting in Supervised Classification from Two Unlabeled Datasets: A Consistent Risk Correction Approachcited by 29
  32. 2019Integrating Semantic Knowledge to Tackle Zero-shot Text Classificationcited by 28
  33. 2019Human-grounded Evaluations of Explanation Methods for Text Classificationcited by 28
  34. 2020Robust Imitation Learning from Noisy Demonstrationscited by 26
  35. 2019Classification from Pairwise Similarities/Dissimilarities and Unlabeled Data via Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 21
  36. 2017Fisher consistency for prior probability shiftcited by 20
  37. 2017Semi-Supervised AUC Optimization based on Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 20
  38. 2018Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Based on Source-guided Discrepancycited by 20

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.