mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Introducing Orthogonal Constraint in Structural Probes

arXiv 2012.15228 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2020cs.CLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the recent success of pre-trained models in NLP, a significant focus was put on interpreting their representations. One of the most prominent approaches is structural probing (Hewitt and Manning, 2019), where a linear projection of word embeddings is performed in order to approximate the topology of dependency structures. In this work, we introduce a new type of structural probing, where the linear projection is decomposed into 1. isomorphic space rotation; 2. linear scaling that identifies and scales the most relevant dimensions. In addition to syntactic dependency, we evaluate our method on novel tasks (lexical hypernymy and position in a sentence). We jointly train the probes for multiple tasks and experimentally show that lexical and syntactic information is separated in the representations. Moreover, the orthogonal constraint makes the Structural Probes less vulnerable to memorization.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 95
  2. 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 62
  3. 2023Sociodemographic Bias in Language Models: A Survey and Forward Pathcited by 28
  4. 2024A polar coordinate system represents syntax in large language modelscited by 25
  5. 2022Don't Forget About Pronouns: Removing Gender Bias in Language Models Without Losing Factual Gender Informationcited by 16
  6. 2022AST-Probe: Recovering abstract syntax trees from hidden representations of pre-trained language modelscited by 16
  7. 2022Probing for Labeled Dependency Treescited by 8
  8. 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic reviewcited by 7
  9. 2025Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic Evaluationscited by 7
  10. 2025Probing Syntax in Large Language Models: Successes and Remaining Challengescited by 5
  11. 2025Reference-Free Rating of LLM Responses via Latent Informationcited by 4
  12. 2023Understanding the Role of Input Token Characters in Language Models: How Does Information Loss Affect Performance?cited by 2
9 more
  1. 2026Emergence of Phonemic, Syntactic, and Semantic Representations in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 2
  2. 2026Polar probe linearly decodes semantic structures from LLMscited by 2
  3. 2021Examining Cross-lingual Contextual Embeddings with Orthogonal Structural Probescited by 1
  4. 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
  5. 2026Relation Geometry in Semantic Space of Language Modelscited by 1
  6. 2023Disentangling the Linguistic Competence of Privacy-Preserving BERTcited by 0
  7. 2023Rethinking the Construction of Effective Metrics for Understanding the Mechanisms of Pretrained Language Modelscited by 0
  8. 2025Derivational Probing: Unveiling the Layer-wise Derivation of Syntactic Structures in Neural Language Modelscited by 0
  9. 2026Gated Tree Cross-Attention for Checkpoint-Compatible Syntax Injection in Decoder-Only LLMscited by 0