Disentangling the Linguistic Competence of Privacy-Preserving BERT
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differential Privacy (DP) has been tailored to address the unique challenges of text-to-text privatization. However, text-to-text privatization is known for degrading the performance of language models when trained on perturbed text. Employing a series of interpretation techniques on the internal representations extracted from BERT trained on perturbed pre-text, we intend to disentangle at the linguistic level the distortion induced by differential privacy. Experimental results from a representational similarity analysis indicate that the overall similarity of internal representations is substantially reduced. Using probing tasks to unpack this dissimilarity, we find evidence that text-to-text privatization affects the linguistic competence across several formalisms, encoding localized properties of words while falling short at encoding the contextual relationships between spans of words.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.
Builds on
58 of 77 references.
References · 58
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
38 more
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
- 2019Revealing the Dark Secrets of BERTcited by 301
- 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 243
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 213
- 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 203
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 192
- 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 166
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
- 2018Dissecting Contextual Word Embeddings: Architecture and Representationcited by 146
- 2019The Bottom-up Evolution of Representations in the Transformer: A Study with Machine Translation and Language Modeling Objectivescited by 139
- 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 120
- 2019Privacy- and Utility-Preserving Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbationscited by 119
- 2019On Identifiability in Transformerscited by 116
- 2020What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?cited by 113
- 2017Learned in Translation: Contextualized Word Vectorscited by 104
- 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 94
- 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 88
- 2021Differential Privacy for Text Analytics via Natural Text Sanitizationcited by 77
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretabilitycited by 75
- 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
- 2021Selective Differential Privacy for Language Modelingcited by 62
- 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 62
- 2021Natural Language Understanding with Privacy-Preserving BERTcited by 55
- 2018Generalised Differential Privacy for Text Document Processingcited by 52
- 2022A Customized Text Sanitization Mechanism with Differential Privacycited by 52
- 2021Probing BERT in Hyperbolic Spacescited by 50
- 2020A Differentially Private Text Perturbation Method Using a Regularized Mahalanobis Metriccited by 42
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.