Probing for Labeled Dependency Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Probing has become an important tool for analyzing representations in Natural Language Processing (NLP). For graphical NLP tasks such as dependency parsing, linear probes are currently limited to extracting undirected or unlabeled parse trees which do not capture the full task. This work introduces DepProbe, a linear probe which can extract labeled and directed dependency parse trees from embeddings while using fewer parameters and compute than prior methods. Leveraging its full task coverage and lightweight parametrization, we investigate its predictive power for selecting the best transfer language for training a full biaffine attention parser. Across 13 languages, our proposed method identifies the best source treebank 94% of the time, outperforming competitive baselines and prior work. Finally, we analyze the informativeness of task-specific subspaces in contextual embeddings as well as which benefits a full parser's non-linear parametrization provides.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
References · 16
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
- 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
- 2020Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERTcited by 108
- 2020Massive Choice, Ample Tasks (MaChAmp): A Toolkit for Multi-task Learning in NLPcited by 50
- 2014A Weighted Correlation Index for Rankings with Tiescited by 41
4 more
- 2020A Tale of a Probe and a Parsercited by 40
- 2020Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms?cited by 30
- 2020Introducing Orthogonal Constraint in Structural Probescited by 21
- 2019Deep Contextualized Word Embeddings in Transition-Based and Graph-Based Dependency Parsing -- A Tale of Two Parsers Revisitedcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Modelscited by 24
- 2024A polar coordinate system represents syntax in large language modelscited by 24
- 2022Evidence > Intuition: Transferability Estimation for Encoder Selectioncited by 7
- 2025Probing Syntax in Large Language Models: Successes and Remaining Challengescited by 4
- 2022Sort by Structure: Language Model Ranking as Dependency Probingcited by 2
- 2023Assessment of Pre-Trained Models Across Languages and Grammarscited by 2
- 2026Emergence of Phonemic, Syntactic, and Semantic Representations in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2026Polar probe linearly decodes semantic structures from LLMscited by 1
- 2026Polar probe linearly decodes semantic structures from LLMs13 May 2026
- 2026Emergence of Phonemic, Syntactic, and Semantic Representations in Artificial Neural Networks26 Jan 2026
- 2025Probing Syntax in Large Language Models: Successes and Remaining Challenges5 Aug 2025
- 2024A polar coordinate system represents syntax in large language models7 Dec 2024
- 2023Assessment of Pre-Trained Models Across Languages and Grammars20 Sep 2023
- 2022Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Models17 Nov 2022
- 2022Evidence > Intuition: Transferability Estimation for Encoder Selection20 Oct 2022
- 2022Sort by Structure: Language Model Ranking as Dependency Probing10 Jun 2022