mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Relation Geometry in Semantic Space of Language Models

arXiv 2607.26762 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When it comes to generating vector representations of words, current language models are achieving high-quality results. However, what is not known is the extent to which knowledge about semantic relations is represented in the geometry of the semantic spaces created in this way. In order to answer this question, we study the relation geometry of such semantic spaces from three perspectives. We first examine whether words standing in a particular relation to a target word~(called relata) occupy the same region in semantic space, and whether the regions corresponding to different relations are distinct from each other. We then verify to what extent semantic spaces reflect certain well-known properties of relations, such as symmetry, asymmetry, and transitivity. Finally, we consider which information about the target words and relata is more important for relation geometry: their surface forms, or their contexts. We conduct experiments on six semantic relations using causal, masked, and diffusion language models. The results show that relata in asymmetric relations relatively clearly occupy a distinct region in semantic space. Asymmetric relations' properties are only moderately well encoded in the semantic space, yet better than those of symmetric ones. Furthermore, when considering the question which information source has the strongest impact on results amongst the models we evaluated, we find that lexical information tends to be more important for the causal language model, whereas contextual information is more important for the masked and diffusion language models. Our results empirically show that relation geometry is not equally well-represented for all relations in semantic space, suggesting that there is a difference in how well semantic relations might be learned from distributional information alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

28 of 61 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 893
  4. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  5. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
  6. 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 279
  7. 2015A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphscited by 264
  8. 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
  9. 2024ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMscited by 145
  10. 2023The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelscited by 108
  11. 2022Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey from the Perspective of Representation Spacescited by 41
  12. 2024Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-layer Communication in Transformer Language Modelscited by 39
16 more
  1. 2022Calibrated Interpretation: Confidence Estimation in Semantic Parsingcited by 33
  2. 2020Introducing Orthogonal Constraint in Structural Probescited by 21
  3. 2021Inspecting the concept knowledge graph encoded by modern language modelscited by 15
  4. 2022Meta-Learning a Cross-lingual Manifold for Semantic Parsingcited by 11
  5. 2025Do Large Language Models Understand Word Senses?cited by 10
  6. 2021Exploring the Representation of Word Meanings in Context: A Case Study on Homonymy and Synonymycited by 9
  7. 2024Analyzing Semantic Change through Lexical Replacementscited by 7
  8. 2019What relations are reliably embeddable in Euclidean space?cited by 6
  9. 2025Linguistic Blind Spots of Large Language Modelscited by 6
  10. 2024Semantic Change Characterization with LLMs using Rhetoricscited by 4
  11. 2019A Non-commutative Bilinear Model for Answering Path Queries in Knowledge Graphscited by 2
  12. 2025Rethinking Word Similarity: Semantic Similarity through Classification Confusioncited by 2
  13. 2026In the LLM era, Word Sense Induction remains unsolvedcited by 2
  14. 2022SpaceE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Linear Transformation in the Entity Spacecited by 1
  15. 2025The quasi-semantic competence of LLMs: a case study on the part-whole relationcited by 1
  16. 2025On the Distinctive Co-occurrence Characteristics of Antonymycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Anatomy of a Truth Direction: Knowledge-Dependent Dimensionality, a Relational Law, and a Shared Category Geometry in Small Language Models
  2. 2026The Geometry of Contextual Relations: Language Models Address Facts by Order of Mention
  3. 2026Text Has Curvature
  4. 2026Context Is King: How In-Context Specification Shapes the Geometry of Concepts
  5. 2026The Lattice Representation Hypothesis of Large Language Models
  6. 2026The Geometry of Knowledge Accessibility in Large Language Models
  7. 2024The All-Seeing Project V2: Towards General Relation Comprehension of the Open World
  8. 2025Hyperbolic Large Language Models