Understanding the Role of Input Token Characters in Language Models: How Does Information Loss Affect Performance?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding how and what pre-trained language models (PLMs) learn about language is an open challenge in natural language processing. Previous work has focused on identifying whether they capture semantic and syntactic information, and how the data or the pre-training objective affects their performance. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous work has specifically examined how information loss in input token characters affects the performance of PLMs. In this study, we address this gap by pre-training language models using small subsets of characters from individual tokens. Surprisingly, we find that pre-training even under extreme settings, i.e. using only one character of each token, the performance retention in standard NLU benchmarks and probing tasks compared to full-token models is high. For instance, a model pre-trained only on single first characters from tokens achieves performance retention of approximately 90% and 77% of the full-token model in SuperGLUE and GLUE tasks, respectively.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.
Builds on
45 of 71 references.
References · 45
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
33 more
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,041
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
- 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
- 2018SentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representationscited by 294
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 176
- 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 119
- 2019Semantics-aware BERT for Language Understandingcited by 111
- 2020A Mathematical Exploration of Why Language Models Help Solve Downstream Taskscited by 71
- 2022Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Numbercited by 57
- 2020Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Inductioncited by 47
- 2019Cloze-driven Pretraining of Self-attention Networkscited by 41
- 2021Does Pretraining for Summarization Require Knowledge Transfer?cited by 30
- 2022Pretraining with Artificial Language: Studying Transferable Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 28
- 2020Introducing Orthogonal Constraint in Structural Probescited by 21
- 2022Downstream Datasets Make Surprisingly Good Pretraining Corporacited by 20
- 2020Parsing as Pretrainingcited by 19
- 2021Frustratingly Simple Pretraining Alternatives to Masked Language Modelingcited by 17
- 2022How does the pre-training objective affect what large language models learn about linguistic properties?cited by 16
- 2020Pre-Training a Language Model Without Human Languagecited by 14
- 2022Pre-training Data Quality and Quantity for a Low-Resource Language: New Corpus and BERT Models for Maltesecited by 14
- 2019Inducing Syntactic Trees from BERT Representationscited by 11
- 2021DOCmT5: Document-Level Pretraining of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 8
- 2022HashFormers: Towards Vocabulary-independent Pre-trained Transformerscited by 6
- 2022Probing for targeted syntactic knowledge through grammatical error detectioncited by 4
- 2022What do Large Language Models Learn beyond Language?cited by 3
- 2022Effective Pre-Training Objectives for Transformer-based Autoencoderscited by 2
- 2023How does the task complexity of masked pretraining objectives affect downstream performance?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.