mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Implicit Bias for Adaptive Optimization Algorithms on Homogeneous Neural Networks

arXiv 2012.06244 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2020cs.LGcited by 43

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite their overwhelming capacity to overfit, deep neural networks trained by specific optimization algorithms tend to generalize well to unseen data. Recently, researchers explained it by investigating the implicit regularization effect of optimization algorithms. A remarkable progress is the work (Lyu&Li, 2019), which proves gradient descent (GD) maximizes the margin of homogeneous deep neural networks. Except GD, adaptive algorithms such as AdaGrad, RMSProp and Adam are popular owing to their rapid training process. However, theoretical guarantee for the generalization of adaptive optimization algorithms is still lacking. In this paper, we study the implicit regularization of adaptive optimization algorithms when they are optimizing the logistic loss on homogeneous deep neural networks. We prove that adaptive algorithms that adopt exponential moving average strategy in conditioner (such as Adam and RMSProp) can maximize the margin of the neural network, while AdaGrad that directly sums historical squared gradients in conditioner can not. It indicates superiority on generalization of exponential moving average strategy in the design of the conditioner. Technically, we provide a unified framework to analyze convergent direction of adaptive optimization algorithms by constructing novel adaptive gradient flow and surrogate margin. Our experiments can well support the theoretical findings on convergent direction of adaptive optimization algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 43 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 10; 2024: 8; 2025: 8; 2026: 10.

43 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Explaining grokking through circuit efficiencycited by 105
  2. 2022The Slingshot Mechanism: An Empirical Study of Adaptive Optimizers and the Grokking Phenomenoncited by 90
  3. 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 88
  4. 2023Dichotomy of Early and Late Phase Implicit Biases Can Provably Induce Grokkingcited by 76
  5. 2023Transformers as Support Vector Machinescited by 67
  6. 2023Max-Margin Token Selection in Attention Mechanismcited by 57
  7. 2024Implicit Bias of AdamW: ℓ_∞ Norm Constrained Optimizationcited by 54
  8. 2022Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descentcited by 38
  9. 2022Topology-aware Generalization of Decentralized SGDcited by 37
  10. 2024Mechanics of Next Token Prediction with Self-Attentioncited by 34
  11. 2025Implicit Bias of Spectral Descent and Muon on Multiclass Separable Datacited by 33
  12. 2024The Implicit Bias of Adam on Separable Datacited by 32
31 more
  1. 2023Don't blame Dataset Shift! Shortcut Learning due to Gradients and Cross Entropycited by 30
  2. 2023A Fast Optimization View: Reformulating Single Layer Attention in LLM Based on Tensor and SVM Trick, and Solving It in Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 30
  3. 2022Mirror Descent Maximizes Generalized Margin and Can Be Implemented Efficientlycited by 25
  4. 2023On the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 25
  5. 2023Two Sides of One Coin: the Limits of Untuned SGD and the Power of Adaptive Methodscited by 23
  6. 2021Does Momentum Change the Implicit Regularization on Separable Data?cited by 21
  7. 2026Emergent Misalignment is Easy, Narrow Misalignment is Hardcited by 21
  8. 2023A Unified Approach to Controlling Implicit Regularization via Mirror Descentcited by 13
  9. 2024Flavors of Margin: Implicit Bias of Steepest Descent in Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 13
  10. 2025The Rich and the Simple: On the Implicit Bias of Adam and SGDcited by 12
  11. 2023Understanding the robustness difference between stochastic gradient descent and adaptive gradient methodscited by 8
  12. 2026The Implicit Bias of Adam and Muon on Smooth Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 6
  13. 2024Learning to Compress: Local Rank and Information Compression in Deep Neural Networkscited by 5
  14. 2026The Effect of Mini-Batch Noise on the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 4
  15. 2026OLion: Approaching the Hadamard Ideal by Intersecting Spectral and ℓ∞ Implicit Biasescited by 3
  16. 2024A Mirror Descent Perspective of Smoothed Sign Descentcited by 2
  17. 2024Continuous-Time Analysis of Adaptive Optimization and Normalizationcited by 2
  18. 2025Understanding Nonlinear Implicit Bias via Region Counts in Input Spacecited by 2
  19. 2025Implicit Bias of Per-sample Adam on Separable Data: Departure from the Full-batch Regimecited by 2
  20. 2025The late-stage training dynamics of (stochastic) subgradient descent on homogeneous neural networkscited by 1
  21. 2026Muon Learns More Robust and Transferable Features than Adamcited by 1
  22. 2021Logit Attenuating Weight Normalizationcited by 0
  23. 2024Slowing Down Forgetting in Continual Learningcited by 0
  24. 2025Gradient Descent Robustly Learns the Intrinsic Dimension of Data in Training Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 0
  25. 2025Heavy-Ball Momentum Method in Continuous Time and Discretization Error Analysiscited by 0
  26. 2025UNIFORM: Unifying Knowledge from Large-scale and Diverse Pre-trained Modelscited by 0
  27. 2026Optimizer-Induced Mode Connectivity: From AdamW to Muoncited by 0
  28. 2026Understanding Dynamics of Adam in Zero-Sum Games: An ODE Approachcited by 0
  29. 2026Stability Annealing Selects the Implicit Bias of Smoothed Sign Descent: A Rate-Indexed Barrier Path on Separable Datacited by 0
  30. 2026On Parameter Symmetries and Conservation Laws in Gradient Flowcited by 0
  31. 2026Optimizer-dependent training dynamics converge to the same one-third optimal data scalingcited by 0