Muon Learns More Robust and Transferable Features than Adam
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Muon has recently emerged as a state-of-the-art optimizer for pretraining Large Language Models (LLMs) and vision classifiers. Despite its efficiency advantage over Adam and SGD, the feature-learning advantage of Muon remains unclear. This paper investigates Muon's feature-learning advantage through the lens of robustness and transferability. First, by evaluating pretrained models on corrupted images and texts, we show that features learned by Muon are consistently more robust than those learned by Adam and SGD across different architectures, including transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Using trained layer-wise probes, we further show that this robustness advantage is reflected in larger logit margins across layers. Second, by training linear classifiers or fine-tuning full models from pretrained parameters on downstream tasks, we demonstrate that Muon-learned features transfer more effectively than those learned by Adam and SGD. This transferability advantage is further supported by the diversity of hidden states across layers, as measured by effective rank. Finally, in a representative classification problem with multi-component features, we prove that Muon attains larger margins and higher effective rank than Adam and SGD, providing theoretical support for our empirical findings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 104 of its 130 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
104 of 130 references.
References · 104
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
38 more
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 671
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
- 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 523
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
- 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 423
- 2018On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transportcited by 422
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
- 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2020Towards Understanding Ensemble, Knowledge Distillation and Self-Distillation in Deep Learningcited by 292
- 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
- 2017Emergence of Invariance and Disentanglement in Deep Representationscited by 213
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
- 2018Riemannian Adaptive Optimization Methodscited by 187
50 most cited of 104 All 104 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.