mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Guided Image Captioning Performance across Domains

arXiv 2012.02339 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2020cs.CV cs.CLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image captioning models generally lack the capability to take into account user interest, and usually default to global descriptions that try to balance readability, informativeness, and information overload. On the other hand, VQA models generally lack the ability to provide long descriptive answers, while expecting the textual question to be quite precise. We present a method to control the concepts that an image caption should focus on, using an additional input called the guiding text that refers to either groundable or ungroundable concepts in the image. Our model consists of a Transformer-based multimodal encoder that uses the guiding text together with global and object-level image features to derive early-fusion representations used to generate the guided caption. While models trained on Visual Genome data have an in-domain advantage of fitting well when guided with automatic object labels, we find that guided captioning models trained on Conceptual Captions generalize better on out-of-domain images and guiding texts. Our human-evaluation results indicate that attempting in-the-wild guided image captioning requires access to large, unrestricted-domain training datasets, and that increased style diversity (even without increasing the number of unique tokens) is a key factor for improved performance.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representationscited by 216
  2. 2021ImageBART: Bidirectional Context with Multinomial Diffusion for Autoregressive Image Synthesiscited by 122
  3. 2023TeCH: Text-guided Reconstruction of Lifelike Clothed Humanscited by 104
  4. 2024All Languages Matter: Evaluating LMMs on Culturally Diverse 100 Languagescited by 55
  5. 2024Understanding the Impact of Negative Prompts: When and How Do They Take Effect?cited by 51
  6. 2021Guiding Visual Question Generationcited by 14
  7. 2023Towards Top-Down Reasoning: An Explainable Multi-Agent Approach for Visual Question Answeringcited by 11
  8. 2021COSMic: A Coherence-Aware Generation Metric for Image Descriptionscited by 9
  9. 2025V2C-CBM: Building Concept Bottlenecks with Vision-to-Concept Tokenizercited by 9
  10. 2022ERNIE-ViL 2.0: Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Image-Text Pre-trainingcited by 8
  11. 2023JaSPICE: Automatic Evaluation Metric Using Predicate-Argument Structures for Image Captioning Modelscited by 6
  12. 2023Understanding the Robustness of Multi-modal Contrastive Learning to Distribution Shiftcited by 4
9 more
  1. 2026Infinity-Parser2 Technical Reportcited by 4
  2. 2025Image Corruption-Inspired Membership Inference Attacks against Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
  3. 2022Training Vision-Language Models with Less Bimodal Supervisioncited by 2
  4. 2024Surveying the Landscape of Image Captioning Evaluation: A Comprehensive Taxonomy, Trends and Metrics Analysiscited by 1
  5. 2026Firebolt-VL: Efficient Vision-Language Understanding with Cross-Modality Modulationcited by 1
  6. 2022Describing image focused in cognitive and visual details for visually impaired people: An approach to generating inclusive paragraphscited by 0
  7. 2023feather -- a Python SDK to share and deploy modelscited by 0
  8. 2025Redemption Score: A Multi-Modal Evaluation Framework for Image Captioning via Distributional, Perceptual, and Linguistic Signal Triangulationcited by 0
  9. 2025Viper-F1: Fast and Fine-Grained Multimodal Understanding with Cross-Modal State-Space Modulationcited by 0