mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

COSMic: A Coherence-Aware Generation Metric for Image Descriptions

arXiv 2109.05281 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developers of text generation models rely on automated evaluation metrics as a stand-in for slow and expensive manual evaluations. However, image captioning metrics have struggled to give accurate learned estimates of the semantic and pragmatic success of output text. We address this weakness by introducing the first discourse-aware learned generation metric for evaluating image descriptions. Our approach is inspired by computational theories of discourse for capturing information goals using coherence. We present a dataset of imageunicodex2013description pairs annotated with coherence relations. We then train a coherence-aware metric on a subset of the Conceptual Captions dataset and measure its effectivenessunicodex2014its ability to predict human ratings of output captionsunicodex2014on a test set composed of out-of-domain images. We demonstrate a higher Kendall Correlation Coefficient for our proposed metric with the human judgments for the results of a number of state-of-the-art coherence-aware caption generation models when compared to several other metrics including recently proposed learned metrics such as BLEURT and BERTScore.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2021.

Builds on

25 of 46 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  5. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  8. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  9. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  10. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  11. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  12. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
13 more
  1. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  2. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  3. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 542
  4. 2019Discourse-Aware Neural Extractive Text Summarizationcited by 104
  5. 2015Are You Talking to a Machine? Dataset and Methods for Multilingual Image Question Answeringcited by 80
  6. 2019AI2D-RST: A multimodal corpus of 1000 primary school science diagramscited by 60
  7. 2018Learning to Evaluate Image Captioningcited by 53
  8. 2019Integrating Text and Image: Determining Multimodal Document Intent in Instagram Postscited by 37
  9. 2020Discern: Discourse-Aware Entailment Reasoning Network for Conversational Machine Readingcited by 33
  10. 2020Clue: Cross-modal Coherence Modeling for Caption Generationcited by 24
  11. 2019VIFIDEL: Evaluating the Visual Fidelity of Image Descriptionscited by 21
  12. 2020Understanding Guided Image Captioning Performance across Domainscited by 21
  13. 2019Understanding, Categorizing and Predicting Semantic Image-Text Relationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

9 papers.