mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the Robustness of Multi-modal Contrastive Learning to Distribution Shift

arXiv 2310.04971 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) approaches, such as CLIP, have achieved a remarkable success in learning representations that are robust against distribution shift and generalize to new domains. Despite the empirical success, the mechanism behind learning such generalizable representations is not understood. In this work, we rigorously analyze this problem and uncover two mechanisms behind MMCL's robustness: intra-class contrasting, which allows the model to learn features with a high variance, and inter-class feature sharing, where annotated details in one class help learning other classes better. Both mechanisms prevent spurious features that are over-represented in the training data to overshadow the generalizable core features. This yields superior zero-shot classification accuracy under distribution shift. Furthermore, we theoretically demonstrate the benefits of using rich captions on robustness and explore the effect of annotating different types of details in the captions. We validate our theoretical findings through experiments, including a well-designed synthetic experiment and an experiment involving training CLIP models on MSCOCO/Conceptual Captions and evaluating them on shifted ImageNets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2023.

Builds on

57 of 69 references.

References · 57

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  7. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  8. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  9. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  10. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  11. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  12. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
38 more
  1. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  2. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  4. 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
  5. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  6. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  7. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  8. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  9. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  10. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  11. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  12. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  13. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  14. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 374
  15. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
  16. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
  17. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  18. 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 254
  19. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  20. 2021Combined Scaling for Zero-shot Transfer Learningcited by 182
  21. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  22. 2020Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear modelscited by 146
  23. 2022Data Determines Distributional Robustness in Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP)cited by 137
  24. 2021On Calibration and Out-of-domain Generalizationcited by 134
  25. 2022CyCLIP: Cyclic Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 127
  26. 2021Toward Understanding the Feature Learning Process of Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 119
  27. 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 119
  28. 2022Understanding Contrastive Learning Requires Incorporating Inductive Biasescited by 96
  29. 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
  30. 2022NICO++: Towards Better Benchmarking for Domain Generalizationcited by 86
  31. 2019Do Image Classifiers Generalize Across Time?cited by 59
  32. 2020Contrastive estimation reveals topic posterior information to linear modelscited by 54
  33. 2021The Power of Contrast for Feature Learning: A Theoretical Analysiscited by 53
  34. 2021A Theory of Label Propagation for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 48
  35. 2021Meta-Learning with Fewer Tasks through Task Interpolationcited by 45
  36. 2023Understanding Multimodal Contrastive Learning and Incorporating Unpaired Datacited by 43
  37. 2016Object Recognition with and without Objectscited by 39
  38. 2022Is a Caption Worth a Thousand Images? A Controlled Study for Representation Learningcited by 39

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4.

4 papers.