mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Margins are Insufficient for Explaining Gradient Boosting

arXiv 2011.04998 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Boosting is one of the most successful ideas in machine learning, achieving great practical performance with little fine-tuning. The success of boosted classifiers is most often attributed to improvements in margins. The focus on margin explanations was pioneered in the seminal work by Schapire et al. (1998) and has culminated in the k'th margin generalization bound by Gao and Zhou (2013), which was recently proved to be near-tight for some data distributions (Gronlund et al. 2019). In this work, we first demonstrate that the k'th margin bound is inadequate in explaining the performance of state-of-the-art gradient boosters. We then explain the short comings of the k'th margin bound and prove a stronger and more refined margin-based generalization bound for boosted classifiers that indeed succeeds in explaining the performance of modern gradient boosters. Finally, we improve upon the recent generalization lower bound by Gronlund et al. (2019).

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.