mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Improved Margin Generalization Bounds for Voting Classifiers

arXiv 2502.16462 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.DS math.STcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we establish a new margin-based generalization bound for voting classifiers, refining existing results and yielding tighter generalization guarantees for widely used boosting algorithms such as AdaBoost (Freund and Schapire, 1997). Furthermore, the new margin-based generalization bound enables the derivation of an optimal weak-to-strong learner: a Majority-of-3 large-margin classifiers with an expected error matching the theoretical lower bound. This result provides a more natural alternative to the Majority-of-5 algorithm by (Hogsgaard et al., 2024), and matches the Majority-of-3 result by (Aden-Ali et al., 2024) for the realizable prediction model.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2025.

Builds on

8 of 20 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
  2. 2022Bagging is an Optimal PAC Learnercited by 34
  3. 2024Majority-of-Three: The Simplest Optimal Learner?cited by 17
  4. 2022Optimal Weak to Strong Learningcited by 14
  5. 2020Margins are Insufficient for Explaining Gradient Boostingcited by 10
  6. 2019Margin-Based Generalization Lower Bounds for Boosted Classifierscited by 9
  7. 2023AdaBoost is not an Optimal Weak to Strong Learnercited by 6
  8. 2024The Many Faces of Optimal Weak-to-Strong Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.