mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting, Voting Classifiers and Randomized Sample Compression Schemes

arXiv 2402.02976 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In boosting, we aim to leverage multiple weak learners to produce a strong learner. At the center of this paradigm lies the concept of building the strong learner as a voting classifier, which outputs a weighted majority vote of the weak learners. While many successful boosting algorithms, such as the iconic AdaBoost, produce voting classifiers, their theoretical performance has long remained sub-optimal: The best known bounds on the number of training examples necessary for a voting classifier to obtain a given accuracy has so far always contained at least two logarithmic factors above what is known to be achievable by general weak-to-strong learners. In this work, we break this barrier by proposing a randomized boosting algorithm that outputs voting classifiers whose generalization error contains a single logarithmic dependency on the sample size. We obtain this result by building a general framework that extends sample compression methods to support randomized learning algorithms based on sub-sampling.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

9 of 27 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2020Proper Learning, Helly Number, and an Optimal SVM Boundcited by 52
  3. 2015Sample compression schemes for VC classescited by 46
  4. 2022Bagging is an Optimal PAC Learnercited by 34
  5. 2022Optimal Weak to Strong Learningcited by 14
  6. 2020Margins are Insufficient for Explaining Gradient Boostingcited by 10
  7. 2019Margin-Based Generalization Lower Bounds for Boosted Classifierscited by 9
  8. 2023The Impossibility of Parallelizing Boostingcited by 7
  9. 2023AdaBoost is not an Optimal Weak to Strong Learnercited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.