mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Many Faces of Optimal Weak-to-Strong Learning

arXiv 2408.17148 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.DScited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Boosting is an extremely successful idea, allowing one to combine multiple low accuracy classifiers into a much more accurate voting classifier. In this work, we present a new and surprisingly simple Boosting algorithm that obtains a provably optimal sample complexity. Sample optimal Boosting algorithms have only recently been developed, and our new algorithm has the fastest runtime among all such algorithms and is the simplest to describe: Partition your training data into 5 disjoint pieces of equal size, run AdaBoost on each, and combine the resulting classifiers via a majority vote. In addition to this theoretical contribution, we also perform the first empirical comparison of the proposed sample optimal Boosting algorithms. Our pilot empirical study suggests that our new algorithm might outperform previous algorithms on large data sets.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.

Builds on

7 of 29 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
  3. 2022Bagging is an Optimal PAC Learnercited by 34
  4. 2024Majority-of-Three: The Simplest Optimal Learner?cited by 17
  5. 2022Optimal Weak to Strong Learningcited by 14
  6. 2020Margins are Insufficient for Explaining Gradient Boostingcited by 10
  7. 2023AdaBoost is not an Optimal Weak to Strong Learnercited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.