mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Correspondence Learning via Linearly-invariant Embedding

arXiv 2010.13136 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2020cs.CV cs.CG cs.LGcited by 48

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a fully differentiable pipeline for estimating accurate dense correspondences between 3D point clouds. The proposed pipeline is an extension and a generalization of the functional maps framework. However, instead of using the Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions as done in virtually all previous works in this domain, we demonstrate that learning the basis from data can both improve robustness and lead to better accuracy in challenging settings. We interpret the basis as a learned embedding into a higher dimensional space. Following the functional map paradigm the optimal transformation in this embedding space must be linear and we propose a separate architecture aimed at estimating the transformation by learning optimal descriptor functions. This leads to the first end-to-end trainable functional map-based correspondence approach in which both the basis and the descriptors are learned from data. Interestingly, we also observe that learning a canonical embedding leads to worse results, suggesting that leaving an extra linear degree of freedom to the embedding network gives it more robustness, thereby also shedding light onto the success of previous methods. Finally, we demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art results in challenging non-rigid 3D point cloud correspondence applications.

Key facts. Cited by 48 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 8; 2023: 16; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

48 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Unsupervised Learning of Robust Spectral Shape Matchingcited by 57
  2. 2021Shape registration in the time of transformerscited by 51
  3. 2022Deep Orientation-Aware Functional Maps: Tackling Symmetry Issues in Shape Matchingcited by 36
  4. 2021Multiway Non-rigid Point Cloud Registration via Learned Functional Map Synchronizationcited by 30
  5. 2022Bending Graphs: Hierarchical Shape Matching using Gated Optimal Transportcited by 24
  6. 2023Self-Supervised Learning for Multimodal Non-Rigid 3D Shape Matchingcited by 23
  7. 2023NICP: Neural ICP for 3D Human Registration at Scalecited by 21
  8. 2023Understanding and Improving Features Learned in Deep Functional Mapscited by 20
  9. 2023SE-ORNet: Self-Ensembling Orientation-aware Network for Unsupervised Point Cloud Shape Correspondencecited by 19
  10. 2023NCP: Neural Correspondence Prior for Effective Unsupervised Shape Matchingcited by 18
  11. 2023Hybrid Functional Maps for Crease-Aware Non-Isometric Shape Matchingcited by 18
  12. 2021Differentiable Surface Triangulationcited by 14
36 more
  1. 2023Point2SSM: Learning Morphological Variations of Anatomies from Point Cloudcited by 14
  2. 2025Denoising Functional Maps: Diffusion Models for Shape Correspondencecited by 14
  3. 2025Hierarchical Neural Semantic Representation for 3D Semantic Correspondencecited by 14
  4. 2022Implicit field supervision for robust non-rigid shape matchingcited by 13
  5. 2023Non-Rigid Shape Registration via Deep Functional Maps Priorcited by 12
  6. 2024SRIF: Semantic Shape Registration Empowered by Diffusion-based Image Morphing and Flow Estimationcited by 12
  7. 2024Wormhole Loss for Partial Shape Matchingcited by 12
  8. 2023On Unsupervised Partial Shape Correspondencecited by 11
  9. 2024DV-Matcher: Deformation-based Non-Rigid Point Cloud Matching Guided by Pre-trained Visual Featurescited by 10
  10. 2023Neural Intrinsic Embedding for Non-rigid Point Cloud Matchingcited by 9
  11. 2022Reduced Representation of Deformation Fields for Effective Non-rigid Shape Matchingcited by 8
  12. 2022G-MSM: Unsupervised Multi-Shape Matching with Graph-based Affinity Priorscited by 8
  13. 2021Deep Virtual Markers for Articulated 3D Shapescited by 7
  14. 2023DiscoMatch: Fast Discrete Optimisation for Geometrically Consistent 3D Shape Matchingcited by 7
  15. 2024Shape Non-rigid Kinematics (SNK): A Zero-Shot Method for Non-Rigid Shape Matching via Unsupervised Functional Map Regularized Reconstructioncited by 7
  16. 2024Unsupervised Template-assisted Point Cloud Shape Correspondence Networkcited by 7
  17. 2022Conjugate Product Graphs for Globally Optimal 2D-3D Shape Matchingcited by 6
  18. 2023Kissing to Find a Match: Efficient Low-Rank Permutation Representationcited by 5
  19. 2021Learning Spectral Unions of Partial Deformable 3D Shapescited by 4
  20. 2026Non-Rigid 3D Shape Correspondences: From Foundations to Open Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 4
  21. 2025FUSE: A Flow-based Mapping Between Shapescited by 3
  22. 2022Learning Canonical Embeddings for Unsupervised Shape Correspondence with Locally Linear Transformationscited by 2
  23. 2026RINO: Rotation-Invariant Non-Rigid Correspondencescited by 2
  24. 2021Learning Canonical Embedding for Non-rigid Shape Matchingcited by 1
  25. 2021Smoothness and effective regularizations in learned embeddings for shape matchingcited by 1
  26. 2023Unsupervised Representation Learning for Diverse Deformable Shape Collectionscited by 1
  27. 2023HumanReg: Self-supervised Non-rigid Registration of Human Point Cloudcited by 1
  28. 2026Hyper-Network Neural Functional Maps for Unsupervised Robust 3D Shape Matchingcited by 1
  29. 2026Ordered Diffusion for 3D Human Registrationcited by 1
  30. 2021U-mesh: Human Correspondence Matching with Mesh Convolutional Networkscited by 0
  31. 2021DPC: Unsupervised Deep Point Correspondence via Cross and Self Constructioncited by 0
  32. 2021Joint Symmetry Detection and Shape Matching for Non-Rigid Point Cloudcited by 0
  33. 2022Data-Driven Evaluation of Training Action Space for Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  34. 2023Extracting a functional representation from a dictionary for non-rigid shape matchingcited by 0
  35. 2025NFR: Neural Feature-Guided Non-Rigid Shape Registrationcited by 0
  36. 2026Functional Attention: From Pairwise Affinities to Functional Correspondencescited by 0