mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Spectral Unions of Partial Deformable 3D Shapes

arXiv 2104.00514 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2021cs.GR cs.CG cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spectral geometric methods have brought revolutionary changes to the field of geometry processing. Of particular interest is the study of the Laplacian spectrum as a compact, isometry and permutation-invariant representation of a shape. Some recent works show how the intrinsic geometry of a full shape can be recovered from its spectrum, but there are approaches that consider the more challenging problem of recovering the geometry from the spectral information of partial shapes. In this paper, we propose a possible way to fill this gap. We introduce a learning-based method to estimate the Laplacian spectrum of the union of partial non-rigid 3D shapes, without actually computing the 3D geometry of the union or any correspondence between those partial shapes. We do so by operating purely in the spectral domain and by defining the union operation between short sequences of eigenvalues. We show that the approximated union spectrum can be used as-is to reconstruct the complete geometry [MRC*19], perform region localization on a template [RTO*19] and retrieve shapes from a database, generalizing ShapeDNA [RWP06] to work with partialities. Working with eigenvalues allows us to deal with unknown correspondence, different sampling, and different discretizations (point clouds and meshes alike), making this operation especially robust and general. Our approach is data-driven and can generalize to isometric and non-isometric deformations of the surface, as long as these stay within the same semantic class (e.g., human bodies or horses), as well as to partiality artifacts not seen at training time.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2021.

Builds on

20 of 64 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  2. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  3. 2018PartNet: A Large-scale Benchmark for Fine-grained and Hierarchical Part-level 3D Object Understandingcited by 521
  4. 2017Learning from Synthetic Humanscited by 358
  5. 20163D Menagerie: Modeling the 3D shape and pose of animalscited by 310
  6. 2017Deep Functional Maps: Structured Prediction for Dense Shape Correspondencecited by 134
  7. 2018Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structured Shape Matchingcited by 81
  8. 2015Partial Functional Correspondencecited by 61
  9. 2017Deformable Shape Completion with Graph Convolutional Autoencoderscited by 50
  10. 2020Correspondence Learning via Linearly-invariant Embeddingcited by 48
  11. 2019Cyclic Functional Mapping: Self-supervised correspondence between non-isometric deformable shapescited by 30
  12. 2018FARM: Functional Automatic Registration Method for 3D Human Bodiescited by 26
8 more
  1. 2018Isospectralization, or how to hear shape, style, and correspondencecited by 18
  2. 2020Non-Rigid Puzzlescited by 18
  3. 2019Correspondence-Free Region Localization for Partial Shape Similarity via Hamiltonian Spectrum Alignmentcited by 11
  4. 2020Instant recovery of shape from spectrum via latent space connectionscited by 11
  5. 2020The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Nonrigid Partscited by 7
  6. 2020Unsupervised Dense Shape Correspondence using Heat Kernelscited by 7
  7. 2020High-Resolution Augmentation for Automatic Template-Based Matching of Human Modelscited by 4
  8. 2018Learning Fuzzy Set Representations of Partial Shapes on Dual Embedding Spacescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

4 papers.