mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Kissing to Find a Match: Efficient Low-Rank Permutation Representation

arXiv 2308.13252 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Permutation matrices play a key role in matching and assignment problems across the fields, especially in computer vision and robotics. However, memory for explicitly representing permutation matrices grows quadratically with the size of the problem, prohibiting large problem instances. In this work, we propose to tackle the curse of dimensionality of large permutation matrices by approximating them using low-rank matrix factorization, followed by a nonlinearity. To this end, we rely on the Kissing number theory to infer the minimal rank required for representing a permutation matrix of a given size, which is significantly smaller than the problem size. This leads to a drastic reduction in computation and memory costs, e.g., up to 3 orders of magnitude less memory for a problem of size n=20000, represented using 8.4×105 elements in two small matrices instead of using a single huge matrix with 4× 108 elements. The proposed representation allows for accurate representations of large permutation matrices, which in turn enables handling large problems that would have been infeasible otherwise. We demonstrate the applicability and merits of the proposed approach through a series of experiments on a range of problems that involve predicting permutation matrices, from linear and quadratic assignment to shape matching problems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2023.

Builds on

19 of 52 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Learning from Synthetic Humanscited by 359
  3. 2018Learning Latent Permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn Networkscited by 175
  4. 20183D-CODED : 3D Correspondences by Deep Deformationcited by 160
  5. 2017Deep Functional Maps: Structured Prediction for Dense Shape Correspondencecited by 134
  6. 2020FLOT: Scene Flow on Point Clouds Guided by Optimal Transportcited by 129
  7. 2019Stochastic Optimization of Sorting Networks via Continuous Relaxationscited by 111
  8. 2019Neural Graph Matching Network: Learning Lawler's Quadratic Assignment Problem with Extension to Hypergraph and Multiple-graph Matchingcited by 84
  9. 2021NeuroMorph: Unsupervised Shape Interpolation and Correspondence in One Gocited by 81
  10. 2020Correspondence Learning via Linearly-invariant Embeddingcited by 48
  11. 2020Isometric Multi-Shape Matchingcited by 33
  12. 2017DeepPermNet: Visual Permutation Learningcited by 32
7 more
  1. 2021Q-Match: Iterative Shape Matching via Quantum Annealingcited by 27
  2. 2017Efficient Deformable Shape Correspondence via Kernel Matchingcited by 25
  3. 2023Self-Supervised Learning for Multimodal Non-Rigid 3D Shape Matchingcited by 23
  4. 2017DS*: Tighter Lifting-Free Convex Relaxations for Quadratic Matching Problemscited by 20
  5. 2022Implicit field supervision for robust non-rigid shape matchingcited by 13
  6. 2023Accelerated Algorithms for Nonlinear Matrix Decomposition with the ReLU functioncited by 9
  7. 2016Improving the semidefinite programming bound for the kissing number by exploiting polynomial symmetrycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.