ReviewRobot: Explainable Paper Review Generation based on Knowledge Synthesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To assist human review process, we build a novel ReviewRobot to automatically assign a review score and write comments for multiple categories such as novelty and meaningful comparison. A good review needs to be knowledgeable, namely that the comments should be constructive and informative to help improve the paper; and explainable by providing detailed evidence. ReviewRobot achieves these goals via three steps: (1) We perform domain-specific Information Extraction to construct a knowledge graph (KG) from the target paper under review, a related work KG from the papers cited by the target paper, and a background KG from a large collection of previous papers in the domain. (2) By comparing these three KGs, we predict a review score and detailed structured knowledge as evidence for each review category. (3) We carefully select and generalize human review sentences into templates, and apply these templates to transform the review scores and evidence into natural language comments. Experimental results show that our review score predictor reaches 71.4%-100% accuracy. Human assessment by domain experts shows that 41.7%-70.5% of the comments generated by ReviewRobot are valid and constructive, and better than human-written ones for 20% of the time. Thus, ReviewRobot can serve as an assistant for paper reviewers, program chairs and authors.
Key facts. Cited by 53 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 9; 2025: 13; 2026: 18.
53 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2023ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewingcited by 118
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Paperscited by 98
- 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Processcited by 97
- 2021Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?cited by 63
- 2024OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviewscited by 63
- 2024LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewingcited by 62
- 2025Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluationcited by 41
- 2022Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Reviewcited by 37
- 2024Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistancecited by 33
- 2024Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysiscited by 33
- 2022Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approachcited by 23
- 2021Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challengescited by 21
38 more
- 2021Human Evaluation of Creative NLG Systems: An Interdisciplinary Survey on Recent Paperscited by 18
- 2022A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publicationscited by 18
- 2025The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authorscited by 16
- 2025How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?cited by 15
- 2023Scientific Opinion Summarization: Paper Meta-review Generation Dataset, Methods, and Evaluationcited by 14
- 2021Controllable and Diverse Text Generation in E-commercecited by 13
- 2025Unveiling the Merits and Defects of LLMs in Automatic Review Generation for Scientific Paperscited by 12
- 2023SmartBook: AI-Assisted Situation Report Generation for Intelligence Analystscited by 9
- 2025REMOR: Automated Peer Review Generation with LLM Reasoning and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2025Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Processcited by 8
- 2024Leveraging Professional Radiologists' Expertise to Enhance LLMs' Evaluation for Radiology Reportscited by 7
- 2026NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessmentcited by 6
- 2026Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Futurecited by 6
- 2025A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs' Processing of Academic Text Inputcited by 5
- 2021Determining the Credibility of Science Communicationcited by 4
- 2022Did AI get more negative recently?cited by 4
- 2025Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviewscited by 4
- 2025A Human-AI Collaborative Workflow for Mathematical Discovery: A Case Study in Grover-Compatible Riemannian Optimizationcited by 4
- 2026RIGOURATE: Quantifying Scientific Exaggeration with Evidence-Aligned Claim Evaluationcited by 3
- 2024Streamlining the review process: AI-generated annotations in research manuscriptscited by 2
- 2025MuISQA: Multi-Intent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Scientific Question Answeringcited by 2
- 2025Multi-Agent LLMs for Generating Research Limitationscited by 2
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?cited by 2
- 2023Speculative Exploration on the Concept of Artificial Agents Conducting Autonomous Researchcited by 1
- 2024Deep Transfer Learning Based Peer Review Aggregation and Meta-review Generation for Scientific Articlescited by 1
- 2024Gene-Metabolite Association Prediction with Interactive Knowledge Transfer Enhanced Graph for Metabolite Productioncited by 1
- 2025GUIDE: Towards Scalable Advising for Research Ideascited by 1
- 2026What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?cited by 1
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation Systemcited by 1
- 2026MemoNoveltyAgent: A Historical Research Memory-Aware Agent Workflow for Paper Novelty Assessmentcited by 1
- 2026Decoupling Scores and Text: The Politeness Principle in Peer Reviewcited by 1
- 2026Which Review Aspect Has a Greater Impact on the Duration of Open Peer Review in Multiple Rounds? -- Evidence from Nature Communicationscited by 1
- 2026LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challengescited by 1
- 2026Do Methods Support the Claims? Intra-Paper Verification for Peer Reviewcited by 1
- 2026PaperGuide: Making Small Language-Model Paper-Reading Agents More Efficientcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challengecited by 0
- 2026Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AIcited by 0
- 2026Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generationcited by 0
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
- 2026A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review30 Sep 2026
- 2026Generating Edit-Inducing Questions for AI Research Manuscripts29 Sep 2026
- 2026NVAITC AI Scientist: A Governed End-to-End Research System -- A Hypertension GWAS Case Study13 Jul 2026
- 2026LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges23 Jun 2026
- 2026Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generation22 Jun 2026
- 2026Do Methods Support the Claims? Intra-Paper Verification for Peer Review21 Jun 2026
- 2026Which Review Aspect Has a Greater Impact on the Duration of Open Peer Review in Multiple Rounds? -- Evidence from Nature Communications20 Jun 2026
- 2026Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future30 Apr 2026
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?26 Apr 2026
- 2026Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI21 Apr 2026
- 2026NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment13 Apr 2026
- 2026Decoupling Scores and Text: The Politeness Principle in Peer Review23 Mar 2026
38 more
- 2026MemoNoveltyAgent: A Historical Research Memory-Aware Agent Workflow for Paper Novelty Assessment21 Mar 2026
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation System3 Mar 2026
- 2026Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge2 Mar 2026
- 2026What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?14 Feb 2026
- 2026PaperGuide: Making Small Language-Model Paper-Reading Agents More Efficient19 Jan 2026
- 2026RIGOURATE: Quantifying Scientific Exaggeration with Evidence-Aligned Claim Evaluation7 Jan 2026
- 2025Multi-Agent LLMs for Generating Research Limitations30 Dec 2025
- 2025A Human-AI Collaborative Workflow for Mathematical Discovery: A Case Study in Grover-Compatible Riemannian Optimization10 Dec 2025
- 2025MuISQA: Multi-Intent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Scientific Question Answering20 Nov 2025
- 2025Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process19 Nov 2025
- 2025Unveiling the Merits and Defects of LLMs in Automatic Review Generation for Scientific Papers13 Sep 2025
- 2025The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors31 Aug 2025
- 2025A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs' Processing of Academic Text Input15 Aug 2025
- 2025How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?31 Jul 2025
- 2025GUIDE: Towards Scalable Advising for Research Ideas9 Jul 2025
- 2025REMOR: Automated Peer Review Generation with LLM Reasoning and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning16 May 2025
- 2025Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews9 Apr 2025
- 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Process11 Mar 2025
- 2025Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation7 Feb 2025
- 2024OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews16 Dec 2024
- 2024Streamlining the review process: AI-generated annotations in research manuscripts29 Nov 2024
- 2024Gene-Metabolite Association Prediction with Interactive Knowledge Transfer Enhanced Graph for Metabolite Production24 Oct 2024
- 2024Deep Transfer Learning Based Peer Review Aggregation and Meta-review Generation for Scientific Articles5 Oct 2024
- 2024Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis9 Jul 2024
- 2024LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing24 Jun 2024
- 2024Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistance30 May 2024
- 2024Leveraging Professional Radiologists' Expertise to Enhance LLMs' Evaluation for Radiology Reports29 Jan 2024
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers8 Jan 2024
- 2023Speculative Exploration on the Concept of Artificial Agents Conducting Autonomous Research6 Dec 2023
- 2023ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing1 Jun 2023
- 2023Scientific Opinion Summarization: Paper Meta-review Generation Dataset, Methods, and Evaluation24 May 2023
- 2023SmartBook: AI-Assisted Situation Report Generation for Intelligence Analysts25 Mar 2023
- 2022Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach7 Nov 2022
- 2022Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review22 Apr 2022
- 2022Did AI get more negative recently?28 Feb 2022
- 2022A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publications4 Feb 2022
- 2021Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challenges15 Nov 2021
- 2021Human Evaluation of Creative NLG Systems: An Interdisciplinary Survey on Recent Papers31 Jul 2021
50 newest of 53 All 53 (JSON)
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Paperscited by 98
- 2025Multi-Agent LLMs for Generating Research Limitationscited by 2
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation Systemcited by 1
- 2026MemoNoveltyAgent: A Historical Research Memory-Aware Agent Workflow for Paper Novelty Assessmentcited by 1
- 2026PaperGuide: Making Small Language-Model Paper-Reading Agents More Efficientcited by 0
- 2026NVAITC AI Scientist: A Governed End-to-End Research System -- A Hypertension GWAS Case Studycited by 0
- 2026NVAITC AI Scientist: A Governed End-to-End Research System -- A Hypertension GWAS Case Study13 Jul 2026
- 2026MemoNoveltyAgent: A Historical Research Memory-Aware Agent Workflow for Paper Novelty Assessment21 Mar 2026
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation System3 Mar 2026
- 2026PaperGuide: Making Small Language-Model Paper-Reading Agents More Efficient19 Jan 2026
- 2025Multi-Agent LLMs for Generating Research Limitations30 Dec 2025
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers8 Jan 2024
- 2023ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewingcited by 118
- 2021Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?cited by 63
- 2024OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviewscited by 63
- 2024LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewingcited by 62
- 2022Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Reviewcited by 37
- 2024Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistancecited by 33
- 2024Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysiscited by 33
- 2022Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approachcited by 23
- 2021Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challengescited by 21
- 2021Human Evaluation of Creative NLG Systems: An Interdisciplinary Survey on Recent Paperscited by 18
- 2022A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publicationscited by 18
- 2025The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authorscited by 16
12 most cited of 42 All 42 (JSON)
- 2026A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review30 Sep 2026
- 2026Generating Edit-Inducing Questions for AI Research Manuscripts29 Sep 2026
- 2026Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generation22 Jun 2026
- 2026Do Methods Support the Claims? Intra-Paper Verification for Peer Review21 Jun 2026
- 2026Which Review Aspect Has a Greater Impact on the Duration of Open Peer Review in Multiple Rounds? -- Evidence from Nature Communications20 Jun 2026
- 2026Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future30 Apr 2026
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?26 Apr 2026
- 2026Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI21 Apr 2026
- 2026NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment13 Apr 2026
- 2026Decoupling Scores and Text: The Politeness Principle in Peer Review23 Mar 2026
- 2026Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge2 Mar 2026
- 2026What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?14 Feb 2026
12 newest of 42 All 42 (JSON)