mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NVAITC AI Scientist: A Governed End-to-End Research System -- A Hypertension GWAS Case Study

arXiv 2607.11084 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic research systems are emerging as a new paradigm for coordinating scientific workflows beyond isolated model inference, code generation, or statistical analysis. However, deployment in institutional biomedical environments requires governed mechanisms for research planning, data access, workflow orchestration, evidence tracking, reproducibility, and human oversight. We present NVAITC AI Scientist (NAIS), a governed end-to-end agentic research system designed to support domain-general scientific workflows while keeping protected data within institutional privacy boundaries. NAIS integrates proposal review, execution planning, governed computational routing, reproducible workflow orchestration, evidence generation, and scientist-in-the-loop oversight. We validate NAIS in a real-world hypertension genome-wide association study (GWAS) using hospital-linked genotype and electronic health record (EHR) data from 286,422 individuals under an aggregate-only data policy. The agent planned cohort extraction, orchestrated GWAS execution, generated quality-control summaries, and drafted publication-oriented outputs. Human-AI review identified phenotype discrepancies and enabled iterative refinement of the hypertension definition. After reconciliation, the agent-orchestrated GWAS reproduced established hypertension loci, including FGF5, ATP2B1, CNNM2, FTO, and GRB14, with the strongest signal at FGF5 reaching -log10(p) ~ 70. As a secondary demonstration, NAIS also supported a drug-induced liver injury prediction workflow, achieving a multimodal graph neural network AUC of 0.842. These results demonstrate that governed agentic research systems can support scalable AI-assisted biomedical discovery while producing outputs comparable to expert-led workflows.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

4 of 12 references.

References · 4

  1. 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 353
  2. 2020ReviewRobot: Explainable Paper Review Generation based on Knowledge Synthesiscited by 53
  3. 2026AutoResearchClaw: Self-Reinforcing Autonomous Research with Human-AI Collaborationcited by 23
  4. 2026Evaluating LLM-Based Grant Proposal Review via Structured Perturbationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Coding-Free and Privacy-Preserving Agentic Framework for Data-Driven Clinical Research
  2. 2026DeepER-Med: Advancing Deep Evidence-Based Research in Medicine Through Agentic AI
  3. 2025aiXiv: A Next-Generation Open Access Ecosystem for Scientific Discovery Generated by AI Scientists
  4. 2025AISSISTANT: Human-AI Collaborative Review and Perspective Research Workflows in Data Science
  5. 2026Towards a Medical AI Scientist
  6. 2026ScienceFlow: A long-horizon agent for ML research, scientific discovery and beyond
  7. 2025Multi-Agent Reasoning for Cardiovascular Imaging Phenotype Analysis
  8. 2026Research Assistant: AstraZeneca's Agentic System for R&D