GUIDE: Towards Scalable Advising for Research Ideas
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The field of AI research is advancing at an unprecedented pace, enabling automated hypothesis generation and experimental design across diverse domains such as biology, mathematics, and artificial intelligence. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in the availability of scalable advising systems capable of providing high-quality, well-reasoned feedback to refine proposed hypotheses and experimental designs. To address this challenge, we explore key factors that underlie the development of robust advising systems, including model size, context length, confidence estimation, and structured reasoning processes. Our findings reveal that a relatively small model, when equipped with a well-compressed literature database and a structured reasoning framework, can outperform powerful general-purpose language models such as Deepseek-R1 in terms of acceptance rates for self-ranked top-30% submissions to ICLR 2025. Moreover, when limited to high-confidence predictions, our system achieves an acceptance rate exceeding 90% on the ICLR 2025 test set, underscoring its potential to significantly enhance the quality and efficiency of hypothesis generation and experimental design. The code is released at https://github.com/HowardLiu0830/GUIDE-Research-Idea-Evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.
Builds on
18 of 34 references.
References · 18
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 744
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686
- 2024MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extractioncited by 267
- 2024Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicinecited by 237
- 2024Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM Outputscited by 150
- 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 148
- 2024Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledgecited by 137
- 2023Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinementcited by 89
- 2024Reducing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models via Latent Space Steeringcited by 59
- 2020ReviewRobot: Explainable Paper Review Generation based on Knowledge Synthesiscited by 54
6 more
- 2024Autonomous LLM-driven research from data to human-verifiable research paperscited by 53
- 2024Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Reviewcited by 53
- 2024Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactionscited by 46
- 2021MReD: A Meta-Review Dataset for Structure-Controllable Text Generationcited by 42
- 2023Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experimentcited by 34
- 2024Good Idea or Not, Representation of LLM Could Tellcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025ResearchArcade: Graph Interface for Academic Taskscited by 0
- 2025ResearchArcade: Graph Interface for Academic Tasks27 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Aurora: Neuro-Symbolic AI Driven Advising Agent
- 2025AdvisingWise: Supporting Academic Advising in Higher Education Settings Through a Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Framework
- 2025IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery
- 2025Idea2Plan: Exploring AI-Powered Research Planning
- 2025MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research
- 2025AInstein: Can LLMs Solve Research Problems From Parametric Memory Alone?
- 2026FARS: A Fully Automated Research System Deployed at Scale
- 2025EAIRA: Establishing a Methodology for Evaluating AI Models as Scientific Research Assistants